The reason we Americans are going severely "stupid" with the big SUV's by Chrysler, GM and Ford is because it's subsidized by the U.S. government. Really sad.
We do a lot of things to secure worldwide hydrocarbon energy markets in the name of cheap gas at the stateside pump.
Some of the activities we Yanks do:
1.) Fight wars.
2.) Lots of foreign aid.
3.) Fight wars.
4.) Trade agreements (which are not always in the best interests of us and our allies).
5.) Fight wars.
I might have mentioned that we fight wars for this, but it may have slipped my mind, so I thought I'd toss that in one more time.
When all is said and done, I recall one U.S. economist, using activity based costing, came up with a minimum figure of $11/gallon in the U.S. as the true cost of gasoline here. Avgas would run about $14/gallon.
In short, $2/gallon is a bargain. So is $4/gallon. We're spoiled, so we buy these ridiculous behemoths. Strangely, from an actuarial standpoint, here are the safest and most deadly cars (fatalities per passenger mile) in the U.S for the year 2005:
Safest: Honda Civic 4-dr. Sedan
Deadliest: Chevy S-10 Blazer/GM S-15 Jimmy SUV's (S-15 ceased production in Jan 2005)
Just amazed that insurers have crunched hard data that shows you're safer, for each mile travelled, in an econobox. Don't get me wrong, I like Hondas, but I think it has to do with more than just the car's design. Probably has a lot to do with they type of people Honda targets as a consumer market.
So, for you all on the other side of the pond who scratch your heads as to why we need a 5,500lb. vehicle to commute one driver and no passengers, there's one answer.
v/r, N-A