OK, I'm going to guess that by "processing" you are referring to the fact that your test results for the nitrogen cycle do not seem to be moving very quickly. Is that what you meant?
If so, then maybe I'm getting the hang of your question better, not sure... Part of the whole reason we have these threads and break things down to discuss process is that it is indeed hard to "see" various results in the traditional "visual" way we instinctively turn to. Biological processing and clear water are different things. Except for bacterial blooms, most fishless cycling tanks will appear to be crystal clear for weeks on end.
Flow rate, "Leak-through" and biological processing are all different things. We do want our filter to be funtioning properly. We don't want it to be clogged and we want its flow rate to be sufficient but usally if you can feel a fairly strong flow at the outlet with your hand, you can feel assured that flow rate is ok. We don't want leak-through (water cheating and getting by the media without being forced to flow closely to it) but we're pretty much at the mercy of the designer and manufacturer for that. Your fluval internal is thought to be quite a good design and most all our members that have commented have really liked them and of course for some of them that's referring to "over a long time," so they're telling us that it all "works" for them over time, which is good! The third thing in my mention here is biological processing and for that we just have to go by the long string of ammonia, nitrite, pH and nitrate test results we build up over time. These numbers tell us the most about how our biological filtration picture is shaping up.
~~waterdrop~~