Besides this thread is primarily about where we live, not people living in third world countries and such- their issues are a completely different problem
In your first post, you urged readers to see the bigger picture about the environment. It is arrogant to say that third world countries are not part of the bigger picture. Do not take their needs out of the equation.
Seriously, people would not starve if there's no battery farmed meat- you don't think that people were starving before battery farming became popular in the 70's or couldn't afford animal products do you?
It's not about the amount of meat available, it's about the cost. We see more meat production through battery farming. More meat means lower prices. If people cannot afford the price of meat (like the pricey farm range ones), then yes, people will starve. Besides, there's an almost 40 year gap between the 70's and today. Inflation plays a huge factor. What little buying power the third world people had in the 70's is almost nil today.
And of course these people know there’s plenty of other things that they could eat. The question is, can they afford it? Do a quick scan of their local market and you’ll see pig’s ears, stomach, blood, cow skin and marrow, chicken head and intestines, even coagulated chicken blood for sale. They have utilized every part of the animal primarily because these parts are cheaper. Would they buy farm range meat if they could afford it? Most probably yes, in a heartbeat. But they can’t, so they don’t. They make do with what they have and can afford, and what they afford is battery farm meats. You can’t blame them if they want to eat, can you?
If you really want to see what you are financially supporting with your money every time you buy such farmed animal products, see here;
http/www.goveg.com/factoryFarming.asp
fishkiller_nomore and SuzieQPlecMama you should see the above link.
You go a long way to create a good aquarium, with happy fish which are not kept in cruelty. I�€™m sure you would never intentionally cause an animal suffering- you would never put a kitten in a box and force it to live in its own excrement, never seeing the light of day or breath fresh air.
But in essence you are doing that in a way- you might as well say �€ËÅ“�€�here, I will give you some money if you keep this chicken in a cage so small it cannot even stretch its wings and is given chemicals and hormones to produce an abnormal amount of eggs which causes it much pain and its life is generally one of suffering and hell etc. Every time you farm this way, I�€™ll give you money for it�€� when you buy battery farmed eggs for example.
Mmm thanks for the link, along with the side dish of guilt trip, but I know what battery farming is.
This is essentially what you are doing every time you buy such farmed products- what you buy is what you inevitably end up financially supporting.
Then you know what? So be it. If my money keeps the battery farming industry alive, then good. Because I know that keeping the battery farming industry alive means cheaper prices, not just for me (who happen to live in a first world), but for those people who live in the third world as well. If it helps them feed their families, then good.
I love my pets. I don’t enjoy seeing animals in pain. But animals living in pain and misery is not even remotely comparable to people living in misery and pain. If battery farming is what it takes to keep the meat prices low (and inevitably more people can afford to eat), then I’m for it. It’s sad animals had to be treated that way, but people always come first. I will never turn my back against people, even if that means a harsh life for the animals.
Is that moral enough? Choosing human life over animals?
edited for correcting quote tags.