TwoTankAmin said:Perhaps back then fish were more hardy than they are today?
I did not intentionally junk it.
That is very substantial! But I suppose that's the nature of water in that it doesn't just blend without consequences nor can quantity be replaced without.What I had tried to indicate was the parameter changes detailed (not in red) in my post are substantial. Some drop the listed component by over 90% if you compare the before and after numbers.
I also noted that by doing the daily changes in only 15 minutes sure was not a drip thing any more than it was a plop and drop. But it was closer to P&D than to a drip type process.
Just a side thought...many people report their fish dying mysteriously after a week or two of being just fine...perhaps these longer term but unnoticed physiological changes are the cause?What is clear to me is there do seem to be a number of physiological changes that do not occur in an hour or a day but take longer to become manifest.
That is actually a fair point as we know that breeding has taken its toll. How many of us used to consider a neon a hardy fish but not so much now?I also stumbled across a piece on aquaculture methods using recirculating systems that dates back to 1992. The three authors are from Auburn University, the University of the Virgin Islands and North Carolina State University. Here is a brief quote:
" pH
Fish generally can tolerate a pH range from 6 to 9.5, although a rapid pH change of 2 units or more is harmful, especially to fry."
I assume this meant 2.0 not .20.
Perhaps back then fish were more hardy than they are today?