On another Thread there has been a discussion about the confusion that arises when using common names to identify fish. I don't think it matters and usually we have a good idea of what the fish is that is being described. Sometimes there needs to be clarification but not very often.
When talking about Corydoras for example most of the time it doesn't matter exactly what the species is because they are all so similar. But when talking about Gourami's they are all so different it can be important to know exactly what you have. In the cases where it is vital a photo tells the story.
I don't think we have to worry too much about Latin names, and I feel common names are just fine. I do feel that it is important to have the Latin names available, but I wouldn't want to see them being used all the time. For a starter who wants to learn how to spell most of them, and secondly who can actually pronounce them all correctly. The LFS's get enough flak as it is without making the poor staff trying to remember Latin.
When talking about Corydoras for example most of the time it doesn't matter exactly what the species is because they are all so similar. But when talking about Gourami's they are all so different it can be important to know exactly what you have. In the cases where it is vital a photo tells the story.
I don't think we have to worry too much about Latin names, and I feel common names are just fine. I do feel that it is important to have the Latin names available, but I wouldn't want to see them being used all the time. For a starter who wants to learn how to spell most of them, and secondly who can actually pronounce them all correctly. The LFS's get enough flak as it is without making the poor staff trying to remember Latin.