In a fishless cycle, I would not change water for a while until the plants (if you have them) require and do mostly 30% WCs. Its not so much that bacteria lives in the water, its more letting the biofilm grow and keeping things undisturbed for the bacteria to settle in. Depending on the susbtrate you use, you often mess things around doing large WCs. I wouldn't say it would crash the cycle but my experience certainly vouches for doing fewer WCs speeding up the cycling.Responded to a guys tank issues on a Facebook group and suggested he do weekly 70% water changes. I was told that was way too much. I was even warned that I was going to crash my cycle. Why? The nitrifying bacteria isn’t in the water!?!
Planes dump other stuff before they land, fuel, stuff from the chemical toilets, etc.It would be interesting to see what the environmentalists would say if every time there was a tropical down pour a plane flew over and dumped a whole lot of dechlorinator in the rivers to make them safe for the fish.
No they don’t. That’s an old tale. My friend works for Southwest Airlines and laughs at that story all the time. Toilets don’t get dumped in mid air. Fuel only in an extreme emergency. They foam down the runways now.Planes dump other stuff before they land, fuel, stuff from the chemical toilets, etc.
Where did you get fishless cycle from? We were discussing water changes in established tanks. I believe you got confused.In a fishless cycle, I would not change water for a while until the plants (if you have them) require and do mostly 30% WCs. Its not so much that bacteria lives in the water, its more letting the biofilm grow and keeping things undisturbed for the bacteria to settle in. Depending on the susbtrate you use, you often mess things around doing large WCs. I wouldn't say it would crash the cycle but my experience certainly vouches for doing fewer WCs speeding up the cycling.
if you have some hardy fish in there (Not recommended) while cycling, you need to use Prime to suspend the nasty stuff. Aerating and frequently testing water are a given in either cases. Just my view based on my experience in setting up 3 tanks (disclaimer: I'm relatively new to this hobby)
I don't get this post, can someone explain please.
He's in extreme confusion lolI don't get this post, can someone explain please.
What do you mean?Um, what was the question, again?
The military still dump fuel, it really depends on the safe max landing weights, the U2 spy plane had to virtually be on fumes before it came below that.No they don’t. That’s an old tale. My friend works for Southwest Airlines and laughs at that story all the time. Toilets don’t get dumped in mid air. Fuel only in an extreme emergency. They foam down the runways now.