I'm really sorry, I didn't mean to upset you. When I said *technically* I meant that the law doesn't protect cats, just as it doesn't protect squirrels, mice, rats, worms, etc. I know it's heartbreaking, and the way he dealt with it is appalling. It's just concerning to see how many people would've "killed the dogs", or have the RSPCA take them away when it's not their fault and *technically* other than having the dogs offlead, he hasn't broken any law (that is not to say I agree with what he did as I don't one bit). If he is asked to keep his dogs onlead and muzzled then I don't see anything more needing doing - that's a great outcome. If hed been nice and tried to save your kitten and put his dogs onlead, I feel your grief would still want to blame him and the dogs, that's natural of course.
However, I dont think we should be blaming the dogs for this one bit, they didn't know right from wrong and it's frightening how many people on here believe that if a dog is cat aggressive it means a child will be next, which in the VAST majority of cases is utter rubbish. I've personally had dog/cat/rabbit aggressive dogs here that were no more a risk to my kids than any other dog.
I do understand how upset you are, and your grief at losing your kitten