Ok. Alright. I'm going to have to step in and correct you right there. If the world was blowing up and the gov was telling you to get in this spaceship and go to space or you'll die. Will you do it? If there was an outbreak of the plague that is SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN to be extremely deadly and the gov gave you a weapon to fight it would you take it? This is the same sort of mentality for COVID and the vaccine. You keep arguing that: "Oh but I was fine Oh I know vaccinated people who got really sick and Oh I know unvaccinated people who got mild symptoms" You keep falling for a logical fallacy. You don't account for the people that don't fall into these categories that you set out. You also don't tell us about the age groups of the severe cases people. If they were old, then it makes sense. Young unvaccinated people will get mild symptoms as well. It all depends on the context. There's something called the Simpson's Fallacy that isn't quite related to this topic but I'll put it anyway. REMINDER that the vaccine is SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN to be effective against the virus. Just because oh some people get it and oh some people don't doesn't mean it doesn't work. Back to Simpson's Fallacy(FAABDCAAFDC BBB). Basically,(Source) on social media some news site found that more vaccinated people were dying than unvaccinated. Now, because we know that the vaccine actually helps reduce deaths, some people were suspicious of this. They found that this was because the group that the study was looking at was ages 10-59, which is quite broad. When they looked closer at more specific age groups, they found that it turned out when you put together all the age groups across a broad range, some statistics would flip around. In this case, deaths(the study was focusing on all deaths, not just covid). When you put all these together, you find that because some stats cancel out others, and that the unvaccinated people are safer than vaccinated is completely false. Due to the fact that more unvaccinated people are younger and more vaccinated people are older, and the fact that younger people are less likely to die than older people, this statistic is completely null and void.It's not that I don't want to give a straight answer. It's that it really doesn't matter when it.comes to spreading this virus.
The one aspect of this that is greatly annoying is these "experts" claiming their knowledge is somehow superior to millions of years of evolutionary process. Even in the face of failure, they stick to their guns.
Who is really to say if it really does reduce severity? What is the benchmark? How do people know they wouldn't have had a mild case anyways? It would seem that folks that are meant to die from something like this are dying, regardless of vax status.
The one thing I will agree is that in some people, the symptoms are so benign that they are effectively becoming "super spreaders", because they just don't know. Kinda like what happened to me. I have had a lot of time now to think on it, and I am no longer angry about it. No matter what "could have", it happened. I'm just glad my family and I are still alive.
I know of vaxxed folk who had a way worse experience than I did/am. I know of unvaxxed folk who got less than a cold. You don't know how your body is going to react to this thing until it has to react to it.
It's a personal choice thing for anyone to get the shot. Nobody should be forced. It is unproven at best, despite all the propaganda. Since the death rate from it hovers at around 1.6% here in the states, the vast majority of people were going to suffer mild illness, just as was suggested at the onset. With or without the shots. Some folks do their best to avoid having to go through stuff like illness. It's silly really. Nature doesn't care what you try to intervene with. If it is meant to happen, it is going to. This is what nature is saying to the entire globe right now. No matter how hard you fight it, you'll never escape it. Spiritualists will tell you that we call into our lives the things we fear the most to learn from them. Naturopaths will tell you that you can be in a room full of full blown illness patients, unprotected, and if you are not meant to have it, you won't get it. This too has been proven, time and time again, by folks having this thing in the same house, but others not catching it.
As for stealing genetic code from HIV/AIDS, how do you suppose this would happen without human intervention? Think on that for a bit.
This virus was engineered to do exactly what it is doing. It's a man made animal that was let out of its cage.
Protect yourself however you see fit. Just know that nobody knows the autoimmune issues that are going to come down the pipe in x-amount of time teaching your immune system to attack healthy cells that are producing a viral rna protein. They will tell you nothing will happen, but if they were honest about it, you wouldn't do it. Anything your government have to force people to do, no matter what it is, is cause for alarm.
It's fallacies like these that completely nullify arguments like yours. NOW ON TO THE SCIENCE
You said that people can be in the same house and not get sick. Well, sometimes you just don't. Sometimes it's just luck. and sometimes, THE PEOPLE ARE FREAKING VACCINATED. Ahem, to simplify, all the vaccine does is just send in mRNA that tells your body to build virus proteins, and then the body recognizes it and destroys the proteins, while at the same time memorizing it in its database of B-cells and T-cells. The reason some people get side-effects is because the body overreacts a bit, and normally it isn't too overreactive, and it just shows itself as mild cold symptoms. I'm assuming you know all this because you're "a medical person or something or other". However, the fact you don't want to get vaccinated astonishes me. I'm trying to be civil here. You also said that they're going to send in mRNA to tell your body to kill itself. WHY IN THE WORLD WOULD ANYBODY DO THAT. mRNA proteins don't come out of nowhere. Remember that when the body interacts with the antigen, it needs the dendritic cell to bring the antigen to the t cells. If there's no existing T-cell to bring it to(basically T-cells are constantly being made[the body puts together random combinations of proteins that new T-cells can recognize and makes them, which means you have a response to all possible pathogens it's really hard to explain], and in order for the body to not get blown up from the inside, they are put through some tests to see if they react to bodily cells. If they react, then they are killed.), then nothing happens. mRNA vaccines are not going to start autoimmune diseases. If the body had a T-cell that responded to that specific antigen, then it would have attacked the body long ago. THINK!
And the last part about people trying to outthink millions of years of genetics. Yeah, that's bs. We aren't trying to outthink the immune system, we're trying to improve it. We're training the immune system. Using some of the genetic code of HIV/AIDS viruses is just to help us make the mRNA more efficient. We can't manually code mRNA, because that would take forever. And about trying to escape the virus, also remember that we've defeated many, many pathogens before(polio, smallpox, etc.) and that they've been completely eradicated. The only reason we keep weakened versions in labs is just in case we encounter them again. And the fact that you're arguing that we can't fight off viruses is total bs.
To conclude, you're wrong, everything I've written above disproves it. This took a considerable toll on my sanity.
Last edited: