And here again we see the dilemma faced by all of us in this hobby. One the one hand we need to be able to see reasonable test results but on the other almost none of us can afford the kind of tests or testing equipment that would fill this need. The problems is that very often we see situations like this one. We know the way the bacterial nitrifying process works in a tank: ammonia-->nitrite-->nitrate. Further we can calculate about what should happen in this respect. And then we are hit with the problem.
We add ammonia, we test and the results from the tests do not jibe with what is expected be based on the chemistry and biology involved. The problem is that most of us then trust the test results anyhow.
As far as I have come to know and understand, nitrite is almost never seen in one's tap. We do not add nitrite directly to tanks and we know plants don't consume it either. The only time we can even see nitrite in a tank is when it is being cycled or when something happens to affect and established cycle. Given these facts and given those reported above, things do not jibe. So the question becomes why not. And I can offer a ton of reasons:
1. While everybody reports they have performed the test correctly, this doesn't make that true. people do make mistakes. they fail to clean the tubes well before testing, the lose count of drops, they take the sample from the surface water etc.
2. The tests use drops, the bottles are cheap, and drop sizes can vary for any number of reasons.
3. Test results can become inaccurate due to certain things in the water. For ammonia iron messes up results as does any clouding of the water (turbidity).
4. Color interpretation using human eyes is subjective to some extent.
5. Dechlors and ammonia detoxifiers can mess with results.
6. Relevant information is almost always left out by the OP because they are not aware it matters.
7. Adding bacteria and/or live plants to a tank will change results from a cycle w/o any of this. But usually it will affect both ammonia and nitrite levels similarly. Most often the biggest effect is on nitrite and it is in the opposite direction as reported here.
7. Etc. etc.
So we have a tank that apparently started at 0/0, had at least 3.5 ppm of ammonia added, days later it has not dropped yet there are apparently nitrites. All I can say here is the numbers are wrong somewhere. Either more ammonia went in than realized, the ammonia test results are not correct and/or the same for the nitrite reading. There is a reason for what we are seeing here and the one thing it can't be is all true.
Cycling is a process and the only way to make sense out of somebody else's cycling issues in many cases is to have full and complete information detailing everything that went into a tank since day one. This is why the easiest solution is often to do a massive water change to reset things and then to test and redose ammonia accordingly.
The other way I tend to look at reports like this one or reports or persistent low levels of ammonia is to ask myself a question. I try to see if I could figure out a reasonable method of reproducing the same result intentionally. If you cannot come up with an answer, the odds are they are not happening naturally either.
"When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth." – Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, stated by Sherlock Holmes.