I can tell, seeing as no matter how much evidence or experience I state to back my claims it's not good enough for you.
What!?!?!? You cited one sentence from nmonks which didn't even say what you are thinking.
Let me help you learn what anecdotal really means:
based on or consisting of reports or observations of usually unscientific observers (www.m-w.com, keyword: anecdotal)
Call the kettle black now.
The things is, though, is that it's not placing a life in jeopardy. Mollies are very tough fish and well adapted to changes in their environment.
First, my point here is that you are providing advice here which serves no other purpose than to propagate your own reputation or something...to be honest, I am not sure what your goal is...but why even suggest something like this when there are much easier methods of doing the same thing? Well, unless you just want to show off or something. Heck, why not simply suggest buying a damsel?
Don't worry, I will let you off the hook on the osmosis debate again.
again the chances of it dying are slim to none; I've seen them survive ammonia and nitrite levels exceeding what a test kit could measure),
Why? Where? Who are you stealing that idea from? Do you think that just because this is possible, you should do it? I once took a bullet right through one of my lungs and not only am I alive, I still can breathe without any problem....doesn't mean I want to do it again, nor push my luck with it again.
I apologize for being so blunt here....but you don't seem to get the point: there is no reason to point out half of what you often times do....sometimes you create these logical bridges that cannot really be made (comparing apples to oranges)....and it seems as though your advice focuses solely on you trying to prove that you are smarter than everyone or something along those lines. I cannot understand why you want to complicate things, and even if that is warranted, why you skip the reasoning behind it so it is all lost in cyber-space.
I may be young, Tommy, be from what I've gathered here I have a much broader range of experience than you seem to... bold statement I know, but I find it to be fitting the situation.
Once again, I couldn't care less about your age, and yes, that is a bold statement coming from someone who does not know me nor what I have experienced. I will tell you what I have noticed your experience stemming from though....taking snippets of information out of context and trying to imply that it holds true in every and any situation, or that just because it could be possible, it should be done. Perhaps you can enlighten us further though...
In your infinite wisdom and experience, why do you feel it to be so important to steer Alex in the direction of a molly versus using what apparently is the 'fools' method of adding some food...or perhaps a hardy (and cheap, in monetary terms only) marine fish like damsel?
Why, in your infinite wisdom and experience, do you feel as though all of Alex's phosphates are coming from 'dead stuff' and not from another source? Did you ask what the phosphate level was before adding the live rock? Why, in your infinite wisdom and experience, is it even necessary to bring phosphates up and seemingly connect them with a cycle when you and I both know that, even if there is a slight connection, it serves no other purpose than for you to throw up some cloud of 'look at me!'.
Nitrogen cycle - "Bacteria found in soils [and water] convert organic forms of nitrogen to inorganic forms of nitrogen" -
University of Missouri
In your infinite wisdom and experience, is phosphate a form of nitrogen?