elephantnose3334
Fishaholic
Yeah, good thinking. I'll wait for my fish to pass away or moved into a bigger tank first, then remove the fake plants and redo the tank.you should be able to put a few shrimp in it now
Don’t miss out on the best deals of the season! Shop now 🎁
Yeah, good thinking. I'll wait for my fish to pass away or moved into a bigger tank first, then remove the fake plants and redo the tank.you should be able to put a few shrimp in it now
Today's Sunday. An idea popped up into my mind yesterday after seeing two large jars (3 and 4 gallons) from Amazon. One of them have a handle, the other does not have a handle. One is slightly cheaper than the other.You can make a small aquarium out of most things but considering the price of that jar ($186), you are better off buying a normal aquarium.
My first experience with live aquatic plants was with an open Jar. Can't remember the size but it was at least 12+ Liters with aqua soil, Sagittaria subulata, and a couple of Marimo balls. A small LED light for 4 hours a day and no inhabitants. It was a great little experiment that lasted about 4-5 months, the sag grew quite well.This will be used as a practice aquarium for small live plants. I was thinking of adding some inverts into the jar aquarium but that'll need some research. I don't know if live plants will thrive in a large jar, but I will try my best in looking after them.
The reason these types of adverts were created was basically to make people stop smoking. The NHS over the last 15-20 years has become so worn-thin from cuts and lack of government attention that the only way money can somewhat be saved and patient lists decreased is by having adverts that show the gruesome nature of smoking, like the Quit Smoking campaign. It's also why the UK also has images of damaged organs, cancers, rotten teeth, etc from smoking on the cigarette packets themselves. It's all an attempt to put people off the idea of smoking.Eww (x3), I do not want to talk about the anti-smoking ad from the UK showing a cigarette with a growth on it... An earlier anti-smoking ad by the British Heart Foundation in 2004 is so gross I don't want to even mention the content of it. I think they were targeted to adults and young adults smoking. Yuck, why did the UK govt. do this? Why? I'm from Australia, not in the UK, but why did they do that?
Interesting, but those ads should have never aired on British TV in my opinion. Did the NHS air these ads with the help of the UK govt.? So how and why people see these adverts on daytime TV?The reason these types of adverts were created was basically to make people stop smoking. The NHS over the last 15-20 years has become so worn-thin from cuts and lack of government attention that the only way money can somewhat be saved and patient lists decreased is by having adverts that show the gruesome nature of smoking, like the Quit Smoking campaign. It's also why the UK also has images of damaged organs, cancers, rotten teeth, etc from smoking on the cigarette packets themselves. It's all an attempt to put people off the idea of smoking.
I did papers on medicine through time while at High school and college from the 9th century up to the 21st, and many papers had questions and references to the 2007 indoor smoking ban, the introduction of images on cigarette packets, and even images of smoking-related patients laying lifeless. It has become quite a large topic of conversation in the UK with it being debated in parliament many times over the last 20 years. Both my parents have been in the NHS for over 35+ years now (ENT) and have seen an increase in patients admitted because of smoking-related illnesses. I couldn't begin to imagine the percentage of patient admittance for respiratory problems.
Those adverts scarred my childhood along with the Speeding car/school trip advert (those in the UK know what I'm talking about). I believe they did as the NHS is gov funded. We in the UK have a 9 pm Watershed where material deemed harmful to children is not broadcast up to 9 pm. Though I think most children nowadays are awake well after 9 pm, I certainly was. I can't fully recall but I swear I saw anti-smoking adverts on daytime television.Interesting, but those ads should have never aired on British TV in my opinion. Did the NHS air these ads with the help of the UK govt.? So how and why people see these adverts on daytime TV?
I see. I understand that some adverts may have a bad impact on us. There was an advert aired that I don't remember some parts of anymore. It was about a man freeing two foxes from a cage and the hens are clucking in fear as the foxes begin to pounce on them, and that woke an onscreen child up from their bed. I don't remember the message anymore, but it may be from the state government. It may have aired once a long time ago.Those adverts scarred my childhood along with the Speeding car/school trip advert (those in the UK know what I'm talking about). I believe they did as the NHS is gov funded. We in the UK have a 9 pm Watershed where material deemed harmful to children is not broadcast up to 9 pm. Though I think most children nowadays are awake well after 9 pm, I certainly was. I can't fully recall but I swear I saw anti-smoking adverts on daytime television.
Watershed - https://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv-radio-a...or-consumers/television/what-is-the-watershed