Wandering this and other on-line resources, it seems that there are certain fish many sources cite as being too inbred to bother with, or are nearly always carrying some fatal disease or other.
These include some of those fish previously described as perfect 'Beginner' fish, for new tanks, community or otherwise.
Neon Tetras - Diseased...so get Cardinals or Green Neons instead.
Guppies - Inbred...so get Endlers instead.
Dwarf Gouramis - Diseased...so get any other small Gourami instead.
Really?!?
These judgements appear to be made with such conviction and they are then passed on and on, often by those who are only responding to what they have heard, rather than actual experience and proper scientific research.
Since February, I've spent a lot of time lurking around my three closest fish shops, staring for too long at neons, guppies and dwarf gourami and am yet to see signs of disease. Speaking to shop staff, (the ones who keep fish themselves and seem to know what they're talking about), whilst it is acknowledged that some disease does exist in fish populations, by the time they reach the shop front,they are healthy and fit for sale. (I know shops would say that, or else they wouldn't sell any fish, but still...)
Each of the fish I've listed are popular fishes, as are the others so labelled and I'm wondering...is this just a US of A thing? I've spoken with aquarist mates here in Blighty who keep these fish and have experienced no difficulties, although each of these is experienced and knows what they're doing.
Being popular, many of these fish will pass through many hands, many of which will not be offering well-nigh perfect care. This alone would result in an above-average mortality, although given the average dishonesty of fishkeepers trying to get refunds, or free replacement fish, or those incapable of taking accountability for their purchases, I then wonder if poor care is not listed as the main cause of death because it is easier to blame 'disease' or 'inbreeding'.
Thoughts?