PaPeRo,
Yes, you are right and that is what I am trying to get at...using some dechlorinators will also remove the chloramines in a water source. Chloramines are, in laymen's terms, just ammonia bonded with chlorine. This means that when some dechlorinators are used, chloramines are broken back down into chlorine and ammonia. The ammonia is what left in the tank however and the chlorine is removed.
So, I appologize for being unclear or misleading in anyway. I do agree wtih you PaPeRo and I am just trying to point out that using products like ammo lock or ammonia removers when trying to cycle a tank sort of defeats the purpose since the bacteria needs the ammonia to feed on. Or in other words...no ammonia = no bacteria (or at least a whole lot less bacteria). That is simply my point since in this situation, from what I understood when reading the origonal question, KiltedCodeWarrior is first asking how long the ammonia out product will work in the tank (i.e. take out or nutralize ammonia) and then second asks if they should put ammonia in the tank. To me, the use of the ammonia out can just be skipped since, from what it sounds like, there are no fish in the tank and the ammonia can be at a level that is toxic to fish, but this will help build the bacteria colony.
So, again, sorry if I was confusing. I am just one of those people who are of the opinon that using a bunch of chemicals and additives to a tank is usually not needed and not always worth the risk, especially with meds or algeacides. I think that this is especially true when trying to cycle a tank since there are so many products on the market that promise a faster cycle time or even an instantly cycled tank which, IMO is not always true.