FalconStorm said:
Now, with the shorter plakat tail genetic in there, it might be different, but I think I read somewhere that the long tail gene is dominant over the short tail. Am I right? You might get a couple of short tailed ct dt's. That might look nice. Go for it if you really want to try. I'd love to see (or get *wink*, *wink*) the results.
Yes, the plakat gene is recessive, as are the CT and DT genes (though CT has some incomplete dominance which results in combtails)
I really really like the look of CT plakats, and I'm starting to like DTs more, which is why I'm inspired to try this... can't imagine what it would look like, though! In plakats the CT trait doesn't make them look as ragged, so I think it might turn out nicely.
I think as soon as the Mini spawn is grown I'll try breeding Lil again, then jump into this project. Maybe I could find a nice marble CT female between now and then and use my marble DT plakat male as the sire
leasbettas-- There are DTs with a 180 degree spread out there... I think the term is "full moons" (get it, get it? HM with two tails = FULL moon
)
Hehe sorry, the term just strikes me as clever.
I figure if I breed a DT plakat with a CT, then breed the offspring of that cross together, I will (in theory) get about 1.6% CT DT plakats... along with practically every combination of CT, DT, and plakat traits you can possibly imagine!! How fun would that be?? Having a pair that throws every tail type out there (excluding HM and veil, though I guess I could also incorporate HM if I started with the right pair)
This is the genetic summary I spent my day putting together. I honestly enjoy this kind thing -- am I crazy or what?!
It includes a trihybrid punnett square, which represents the results of breeding siblings from the DT plakat X CT spawn together, along with tables of percentages for the resulting genotypes and phenotypes (how the babies would actually look, including combtails!)
http/arsenic-tea.com/bettagenetics.doc