Aquarium Fishkeeping - Effect On Nature

Aquarists should only keep fish that can be bred in captivity or if the aquarist is genuinely intere

  • I agree

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I disagree

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other view (Please state)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
I think aquarists should not keep fish caught in the wild unless he/she wants to breed it or for study purposes. Keeping them will result in overly extracting fish from the wild that would eventually endanger its existence.


to be very succint i think there are too many variables to be able to make a generalisation like that or to give a yes/no answer.

fishkeeping is neither wholly bad or good for the natural habitat and natural evolution of species. Each case should be assessed on an individual basis.
 
Well when ure talking about wild caught fish you are talking about marine fish alot of the time. A very high percentage of these fish are wild caught, the coral reefs are in a lot of trouble and we are not helping. Many will die in transport and the farming techniques used by some collectors is damaging the reefs. We need to learn how to captive breed these animals and control and limit what we are taking from the wild.
 
I don't think it would be right to take a fish from the wild and stick it in an aquarium.


Bad luck then, your pictus are most likely wild caught ;)

They probably were. What I was reffering to is stuff like tourists around here picking up hermit crabs and fish at the beach and trying to keep them as pets. They are very ignorantly trying to keep these things from the wild for their annoying children's 5 minutes of entertainment and then the fish die because they know nothing about them, thus robbing them from the local ecosystem. It is sad.
 
I personally believe that the supply of fish should be better controlled, curtailed even. There are no real hobby reasons to buying very large fish (everything from huge cats - knife fish). Neither is there a need for pirhannas, arrowana etc.

The problem lies in the supply not the demand. Reucing the supply will encourage home breeding, local breeding etc. and help curb environmental dammage.

On the other hand, many peoples livelihoods revolve around the fish export business, and so they should not suffer. Instead encourage local breeding of fish (as is happening now).

I highly support breeding of all aquarium fish, but believe at this moment in time, the aquarist hobby is having no postitive impact on fish stocks, ecology or even breeding.

Ask yourself, how much would a Tiger Shovel Nose cat have cost you 5 years ago? and how hard would it have been to get?
 
I believe the sustainability of wild caught ornamental fish stocks should be down to the governments of the countries where they are caught. The ornamental fish trade is an essential part of economic stability of many communities. I believe it does have its positive aspects for the local environments where the fish are wild caught

I also believe that the aquatic trade has been responsible for the preservation of species that would otherwise be lost last time I checked the humble red tail black shark was EXTINCT in the wild, its a common kept fish but only became so because of the demand brought about from the original wild caught stocks, the wild caught stock popularised the fish which led to its captive breeding not the otherway round.

I dont believe there is a harm in keeping a wild caught fish as long as it is a sustainable level. I DO NOT believe that wild caught fish will be unhappy in the environment I provide for them, If I felt wild caught fish would not be happy I wouldnt keep captive bred fish in the same situation either. I have happily caught and kept wild fish myself.

I also believe a bigger question than wild caught or captive bred is whether the immense suffering and death caused by the aquatic trade at all is morally justifiable. Anyone argueing for captive bred only probably hasnt seen the conditions the farmed fish go through to get to their LFS, or the fatality rates of the neon tetra that take its price from 9p at source to £1.20 or so in the LFS! Our aquatic hobby whether wild caught or captive bred only supports needless wholesale deaths of fish, not only in the hands of "bad aquarists" but also as the normal course of things in the supply chain before you even pick your fish out of the display tank.

Your "captive bred" tetras are shipped 2000 to a bag with no filtration, no major oxygenation and cooling down to 18oC for a 24 hour cross the globe trip, fatalities before the point of sale can be 25%+ (whole shipments of 2000 tetras are known to turn up dead!) I accept that this is the reality of the situation - I like to keep fish its the only way I can get many of the fish I like to keep. I accept that many fish may die to make it possible for me to keep the ones I want to keep, its sad but that is the reality. Is a captive bred fish dieing any better than a wild caught fish dieing?

I enjoy breeding fish I support the idea of selling more locally bred fish, but I dont believe that theres a pressing need to bring in huge amounts of bureaucracy and licensing to the hobby. I dont believe ornamental fishing is causing huge damage to wild populations of many species of fish, certainly nothing like the damage caused by food fishing.
 

Most reactions

Back
Top