But do you understand what a backwards mentality that is? "If it makes a nice pet, its wrong to kill it, but if its ugly or we don't have one living in out apartment, lets slit its throat and make a jacket." Do cattle not have the same acuteness for pain and suffering as a dog? Do snakes not have a nervous system comparable to a cat? Does a chicken not like to spread its wings just as much as a parakeet? So why is it ok to torture and confine and kill some animals but not others? Blech, I hate double standards.
Heh, I always wondered if people at this forum eat fish, since they also keep them as pets. Creates a rift in the "but we don't want to eat companion animals" theory. And to be completely honest (listen close cause no vegan or vegitarian will ever admit this), the reason people won't eat meat, or wear leather, or buy a product tested on animals isn't really because it'll do much to harm the company, because we know we're a minority and that these industries won't be brought to their knees by a few angry hippies. The reason people make these choices is that it helps them sleep better at night; in other words, we don't feel right about exploiting animals, so by minimizing the amount of suffering we contribute to, we don't feel quite so badly. That's all. Really, anything anyone does ties somehow to their own benefit, after all.