Hardness - words vs numbers

Essjay

Moderator
Staff member
Global Moderator ⚒️
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
22,120
Reaction score
19,436
Location
Teesside, UK
We always say to look on your water provider's website for hardness, and to ignore any words, look for a number.
These are UK water company definitions of hardness compared to what we consider to be hard, soft and middling in fish keeping.


Always look for numbers :)



dHppmWater companyFish keeping
0 – 2.80 - 50softvery soft
2.8 – 5.650 - 100moderately softsoft
5.6 – 8.4100 - 150slightly hardsoft
8.4 – 11.2150 - 200moderately hardsoft to middling
11.2 – 16.8200 - 300hardmiddling to hard
over 16.8over 300very hardhard to very hard
 
Im not sure in the US they categorize ppm or DGH as soft or hard, they just merely give either a ppm number or a DGH number.
Having said that even if one comes to a consensus about what the numbers represent( soft- hard) the general consensus on what fish one can have in those water parameters wildly varies from source to source, which leads to more confusion in and among the hobby.
 
In the UK, when we search our water company's website for hardness, they always give it in words, and if we are lucky they also give a number.
But the words they use for each band of hardness do not correspond to the words we, as fish keepers, would use for the same numbers. Their words make our water sound harder than we would consider it to be from the numbers.

For example, if the number is 8.5 dH, we would consider that to be suitable for many soft water fish, but the water company would give it as 'moderately hard'. These words could lead the unsuspecting fish keeper to assume they must keep hard water fish.
 
For example, if the number is 8.5 dH, we would consider that to be suitable for many soft water fish, but the water company would give it as 'moderately hard'. These words could lead the unsuspecting fish keeper to assume they must keep hard water fish.
Is that an "agreed" UK wide standard or can the water companies use their own definitions? Would be very useful if it was standardised.
 
My water company, Northumbrian Water, no longer gives numbers. It used to until the end of last year, and then they also gave a coloured chart showing the bands.

Not all water companies define their hardness bands but the ones that do give the same as the table in the first post:
Yorkshire Water
United Utilities
South West Water

Southern Water has fewer bands so they make it sound worse - moderately hard starts at 100 ppm or 5.6 dH!
Southern Water.jpg

Thames Water use a diagram which makes a lot more sense than the bands other companies use
Thames Water.jpg



I haven't looked at every water company by any means. Can I ask UK members to check on their water company's website to see if they give a hardness band table.
 
Really useful - I would imagine that the uk uses those phrases for people to consider using things like Calgon in washing machines to protect against limescale. If they said water was soft in the same way we do they would have customers complaining they were not warned if they got limescale build up.
 
My water company, Northumbrian Water, no longer gives numbers. It used to until the end of last year, and then they also gave a coloured chart showing the bands.

Not all water companies define their hardness bands but the ones that do give the same as the table in the first post:
Yorkshire Water
United Utilities
South West Water

Southern Water has fewer bands so they make it sound worse - moderately hard starts at 100 ppm or 5.6 dH!
View attachment 111951

Thames Water use a diagram
View attachment 111950



I haven't looked at every water company by any means. Can I ask UK members to check on their water company's website to see if they give a hardness band table.
Would be a really good feature on the website if we could collate the info for different areas
 
I would imagine that the uk uses those phrases for people to consider using things like Calgon in washing machines to protect against limescale.
Companies making water softeners use the same bands.
 
I knew I'd posted an image some time ago and I have managed to find it.

This is a diagram which Northumbrian Water gave up to the middle of last year, but it is in the scale mg/l calcium so I'll need to convert the numbers.
Northumbrian Water.jpg

20 = 2.8 dH and 50 ppm
40 = 5.6 dH and 100 ppm
60 = 8.4 dH and 150 ppm
80 = 11.2 dH and 200 ppm
120 = 16.8 dH and 300 ppm

In other words, the same as the table in the first post


Edit to add - Essex & Suffolk Water are part of the same group as Northumbrian Water so that chart apples to them as well.
 
Last edited:
Southeast water now gives a number based on your address. It corresponds to my own tests

275 mg/l CaCO₃
19.25 English degrees or degrees clark
27.5 French degrees
15.4 German degrees
2.75 mmol/l
15.4 Grains per US gallon
19.25 Grains per British Gallon

This means your water is classified as hard
 

Most reactions

Back
Top