[/quote]
I don't quite understand why you think these things.
Fighting bettas for a short time can't be cruel to them, because they do it in the wild. Male bettas don't HAVE to fight each other, but they evolved this way. Scientific studies showed that they found it rewarding to have another male to attack. And if you have ever used a mirror on your fish, you would know that after the losing fish has retreated (when you remove the mirror), the winning fish looks very proud of himself and very happy, might get to work on his bubble nest, might beg for food.. they feel very good after a fight.
Yes, in the wild they have places to hide - that is why you remove them after a short time and don't allow them to fight forever.
Just to be safe, a large heavily planted tank would be ideal, so that once the loser runs away and hides, he can be removed.
I think if done safely and with care, a fish fight could be interesting... not saying I'd ever do it, I'd be too worried about the fish, but for someone who wants to, what exactly is wrong with it? The fish seem to find it rewarding to have the chance to attack another fish, it provides us amusement (which is exactly the reason why you have pets anyway.. to provide you amusement... even if you do care about them, you probably wouldn't keep them if you thought they were boring), it's exactly what they do in the wild, and if done correctly could be safe...
This is just me though.. please don't be angry, I am a bit new at this, and if there are reasons why this shouldn't happen I am open to them. I am just not seeing any right now.
[/quote]
I am not angry I am simply posting my opinion, I do find it strange however that you have this "ability" to tell what a fish is feeling......
......... And so you are ok with it being done to make the winner "feel good" and well the loser just feels nothing right???
Not everything that is done "in the wild" is safe or not harmful, just because it is "normal" for battas to fight in the wild does not mean it is necesary or right. And my idea of being intertained is not watching an animal being injured. if it is natural or not harmful then why do MOST Betta Clubs, Organizations ect are against it? here are some examples:
“Whereas the objective of the Betta Club (Singapore) is to promote the breeding and showing of show bettas; and whereas the use of bettas in fights results in unnecessary injuries to the combatants involved; and whereas the fighting of bettas is an illegal bloodsport in Singapore; the Betta Club (Singapore) frowns on, and is against the "sport" of fighting betta species, whether in organised fights or individual challenges."
"Aquamaniacs is strongly against fighting bettas and if a site devoted to fighting them gets a referral."