I was just reading an article by a figure in the British Veterinary Association, discussing exotic pets and the issues vets see with them. The author mentioned the trade in wild caught fish, and her perception of a need for change there. I'm going to be a bit utopian here, and play a thought game. I think it's foolish to dream of an ethical system that puts the welfare and sound raising of fish ahead of profit when we have near monopolies in much of North America. Shareholder returns matter more than sound practices as we stand now, and the trend is to get worse, not better.
But there are initiatives involving local communities of fishers in the protection of the species they make their livings selling. There are hopeful reports of larger populations of commercially valuable fish close to the villages that collect them.
The farms are growing, as the Chinese market takes off, and there, there is a problem as we see how unhealthy the fish bred and raised in industrial quantities can be. These fish are dirt cheap, and that's what matters to the large chains when they exercise their buying clout. But the 'what if' game is to ask ourselves - how more, percentage-wise, would we be willing to pay for healthy, ethically raised aquarium fish if such practices existed?
I'd pay 100% more if I knew I was getting fish with a great chance of a long healthy life. Right now, farmed fish are a lottery, and I haven't had many winning tickets over the past 2 years. But farms with different rules on crowding, regulated numbers of fish per bag for shipping, etc would change a lot. It's unlikely, but would we pay for it?
But there are initiatives involving local communities of fishers in the protection of the species they make their livings selling. There are hopeful reports of larger populations of commercially valuable fish close to the villages that collect them.
The farms are growing, as the Chinese market takes off, and there, there is a problem as we see how unhealthy the fish bred and raised in industrial quantities can be. These fish are dirt cheap, and that's what matters to the large chains when they exercise their buying clout. But the 'what if' game is to ask ourselves - how more, percentage-wise, would we be willing to pay for healthy, ethically raised aquarium fish if such practices existed?
I'd pay 100% more if I knew I was getting fish with a great chance of a long healthy life. Right now, farmed fish are a lottery, and I haven't had many winning tickets over the past 2 years. But farms with different rules on crowding, regulated numbers of fish per bag for shipping, etc would change a lot. It's unlikely, but would we pay for it?