I see a lot of new aquarists posting desperate questions and getting quick answers they accept immediately. We want answers.
But what if the answers we get and give are wrong? 25 years ago, I was pretty confident in my aquarium knowledge, after 30 years with fish. Now, after 56 years, I am struck by how little I actually know in comparion with what I can learn. I think that's a natural progression in learning - we tend to gloss over how complicated things can be, and when we're new at things, we want to feel confident and certain.
Don't trust us.
Sometimes, I see people answer who are less experienced than the person asking the question, but very certain in their writing style. How can you sort out who knows and who looks like they know?
Read the explanations why and see what you would conclude from them. If you are answering, take that extra few minutes to explain your logic. There is incredible knowledge and experience here, but it takes a slightly critical eye to see who is who, and what is what. We're always going to be exploring this together.
But what if the answers we get and give are wrong? 25 years ago, I was pretty confident in my aquarium knowledge, after 30 years with fish. Now, after 56 years, I am struck by how little I actually know in comparion with what I can learn. I think that's a natural progression in learning - we tend to gloss over how complicated things can be, and when we're new at things, we want to feel confident and certain.
Don't trust us.
Sometimes, I see people answer who are less experienced than the person asking the question, but very certain in their writing style. How can you sort out who knows and who looks like they know?
Read the explanations why and see what you would conclude from them. If you are answering, take that extra few minutes to explain your logic. There is incredible knowledge and experience here, but it takes a slightly critical eye to see who is who, and what is what. We're always going to be exploring this together.