DutchMuch
Fish Addict
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2017
- Messages
- 756
- Reaction score
- 215
ah ok here I was, found my placeIs it alright if I continue on with your 10 myths post?
Don’t miss out on the best deals of the season! Shop now 🎁
ah ok here I was, found my placeIs it alright if I continue on with your 10 myths post?
Woops just saw this, sounds good. Where should we start about it? "1 ft long cherry shrimp" thing or... lolI am too. Let's just move on to the Mariana trench, 'cause you mentioned that at the very start.
Also, about the graphs, mine was a "reconstruction", not the original. The interglacial temperature graph you presented isn't what I'd call visually accurate. It has been made in such as way that is shows a supposedly bigger difference now. If it was edited for the y-axis to start at 0, then you would see quite a difference to that. Also, the top temperature for the Minoan Warming was only around -28.75 degrees Celsius, but the modern one is about -31.5.
If it went from the severe little ice age to warmer than the Medieval Warm Period in a short amount of time, doesn't that suggest human caused climate change? If that isn't enough, look at the graph. The temperature starts going up drastically part way through the 1800's, around the time of the industrial revolution. I don't think that's just a coincidence.The graph below showed the medieval warm period was within 0.5C of todays temperature. The little ice age is also more sever than in the graph you linked to
Please link the evidence.And there is growing evidence that it was the sun that did it. Not CO2.
I didn't say it would. I said it would make the changes not look as big. I was just saying the graph was misleading in the way it was presented.Changing the Y axis on a graph will not change that fact.
I would not want to see that. That mouth... reminds me of the goblin shark (which I believe is from the Mariana Trench).yea ive seen those things, so weird.... what if they were like actual and normal sized