Surely it cant be...?

[NannaLou]

National geographic but point is that these mutations are natural and when used with restraint isn’t harmful.

I’m getting a little frustrated with your prolific postings that come across in an argumentative manner.

I’m 5’7 on a good day, my son in 6’5”…that’s not a mutation “used with restraint“ that’s genetics…the 6’3” of his dad.

EDIT: I’ve lost the end of that sentence - and the fact that my dad, brother and uncle are all 6’4”+…

 

[Slaphppy7]

Let's keep the discussion civil here, please...no need for drama

 

[Corypower]

I meant when used on the fish

I’m getting a little frustrated with your prolific postings that come across in an argumentative manner.

I’m 5’7 on a good day, my son in 6’5”…that’s not a mutation “used with restraint“ that’s genetics…the 6’3” of his dad.

EDIT: I’ve lost the end of that sentence - and the fact that my dad, brother and uncle are all 6’4”+…

it should be done with restraint like don’t over do it,and why are you taking it so personally? I am not arguing with anyone,they make them big by inter breeding the biggest fishes you can use restraint for that

 

[Corypower]

Let's keep the discussion civil here, please...no need for drama

I am some people seem to always take thing so personally when the conversation doesn’t involve them

 

[Corypower]

You are arguing a point, just for the sake of arguing and it's getting tiresome.

Please do NOT tell me to 'watch documentaries'. I have no need, having studied hard at school and university. If they are the basis of your education, then you will have problems later in life.
I watch more than National Geographic television documentaries and have an MA in biological sciences.

YOU said, and I quote "This process actually happens in nature too but In smaller number so it’s not actually bad for the fish".
I said that you are wrong and that is does harm fish.
I gave solid examples.
I also described how, even in the artificial aquarium setting, it is harmful to the fish. Again, I gave solid examples.

Once more and for the final time, mutations occur all the time and occasionally they benefit the animal. Occasionally. The majority cause the animal harm and, in the natural world, animals with those mutations die off. In the aquarium, those harmful mutations are encouraged by some, who think that the end result looks good. Idiots than buy these fish, because they look good, being ignorant of the actual harm done to the fish.
Those few mutations that benefit an animal are, by nature, slight. Extreme mutations occur and these cause harm. The example given of giant human beings is a good one, because those people suffer badly with circulatory problems and bone/joint issues.

I find your argumentative nature pointless, based, as it is, on ignorance. Henceforth, I will ignore your posts.

You just replied

 

[Slaphppy7]

I am some people seem to always take thing so personally when the conversation doesn’t involve them

You are being argumentative and judgmental, and it will not be tolerated much longer.

You've been warned once, consider this your second.

 

[Corypower]

You are being argumentative and judgmental, and it will not be tolerated much longer.

You've been warned once, consider this your second.

It’s the truth not a judgment. How unreasonable

 

[Avel1896]

This process actually happens in nature too but In smaller number so it’s not actually bad for the fish

When it happens in nature those one of a king don't survive for long....

 

[foxgirl158]

My word, all the OP wanted was a confirmation on whether their fish were corys or not and instead they got an argument about evolution

 

[Slaphppy7]

My word, all the OP wanted was a confirmation on whether their fish were corys or not and instead they got an argument about evolution

Yes, a "tad" off-topic, I would say...