A few comments on this. I'm sure the fish I've gotten shipped from South America through a transshipper were not packed with O2 in the bags. I'm also sure the fish I've gotten shipped in from various sources in the continental US were not shipped with O2 in the bag. I've got a tank load of baby albino bristlenose, I would have no problem bagging them tonight, letting them sit in my fishroom, and seeing how they are in 24 hours, this is how sure I am that they don't need O2.
It is warm enough now where a heat pack would not be needed for plecs. Receiving shipped fish is a good reason to have Ammo-Lock, or another product that neutralizes ammonia on hand, I normally use a good dose of prime. Aerating is part of drip acclimating, which is what I've found to be the best way to acclimate shipped fish.
We have a Classified section for a reason, with rules that are in place for a reason. One of those rules is all negotiations taking place in the topic. We have had problems in the past with members trying to negotiate through the pm system, and having a situation where either fish are shipped with no payment received, or fish paid for with no fish being received. In these situations there is not much the mods & admin can do to rectify the situation, as tracking down what actually happened through a bunch of forwarded pm's that may or may not have been edited is near impossible.
The best thing both parties can do here is look back through each others posts & transactions, and see if you are willing to assume the risk involved. Personally I would not conduct this as you have planned;
<a href="http/www.fishforums.net/index.php?showto...40&start=40" target="_blank">http/www.fishforums.net/index.php?showto...40&start=40</a> Posts # 44 & 46
Unfortunately, you have misunderstood the situation entirely. I made a simple post about a heat pack for shipping my fish and just because the receiver happened to be interested in my question, you have (amazingly) construed it as some sort of "negotiation." I am NOT "negotiating" with anyone. I told Love4Aquatics in EMAIL that I wasn't sure about the heat packs and had therefore posted the question in this forum. NATURALLY, he would be curious enough to want to check out what advice I received. We have been conversing through email for months about my fish - NOT through your forum.
This is NO "negotiation." This is a GIFT. I paid an enormous amount of money for supplies and shipping just to make sure my fish go to an experienced aquarist who would take good care of them and, after reading all of his posts, I am even more at ease. But I am curious why an administrator would be so keen to besmerch a member in this way?
And one other thing. Could you please explain our "plans" to everyone in the group, ("...would not conduct this as you have planned..,") since you claim to know the intimate details.
The only thing I may have misunderstood is that there is no payment or trade offered for the fish you plan on shipping. I first gave you some information on the use of O2 when shipping fish after you mentioned that using O2 sounded like a lot of work. I even gave you hints on how to replicate a shipment without having to go through the monetary investment of actually shipping.
I then commented on the use of heat packs this time of year with the species you plan on shipping. I even added a bit of acclimating info, something good suppliers & shippers provide to customers.
Boohag: Yes, merely to appear on-topic as an opening to post your "links." I've seen this type of behavior before, but never by an administrator.
I mentioned the classified section, as this is the area where transactions, even free fish, are posted, discussed, and negotiated. Though you may have been discussing this through another means other than this forum, once you do start discussing it on this forum it becomes the concern of the moderating team and I.
Boohag: There was NO discussion. love4aquatic happened to mention that he was the receiver, as an emphasis on why he wanted the poster to expound on his technical comments. I didn't even know he had posted here until tonight, when I read YOUR complaint about our non-existent "discussion." We haven't even addressed each other in this thread, as anyone can plainly see.
This topic was brought to my attention by another moderator, as a topic in the moderator’s section. This is not the first time this member has had a topic in the moderator’s section. I would like for you to point out where you see besmirching, as I mentioned both parties, and provided a link to a topic that may offer a bit of insight.
Boohag: You must be kidding. You posted a link that placed love4aquatics in the harshest light possible, while the other party appeared an innocent. There's a term for that: "besmerching." Had my interests been your primary concern, you would have emailed or messaged me privately. Rather, you got your chance and you jumped on it.
It might be a good idea for you to spend some time going through as many of my posts as you have time to, and see where I “besmirch” another member. It might also be a good time to reflect on why an administrator here would be kind enough to give you this sort of a heads up concerning aquatic transactions.
Boohag: You should refrain from giving your "kind" advise unless you know what you're talking about, or even better, let someone else, without malice handle it, for they would have most definitely contacted me privately.
Explain where I stated I know the intimate details in your planned transaction. I know the details you have provided, and assisted you in the best way possible utilizing these details. Most probably there are “intimate” details that I am aware of that you are not.
Boohag: YOUR comment: "Personally I would not conduct this as you have planned." No "transaction" has even been mentioned once in this thread, much less any "plan."
Just a word to the wise. Use what you have been freely given, or don’t, your choice.
Boohag: And let me share this sage advice. Conduct yourself as an administrator.