Origins Of The L Numbering System?

Miss Wiggle

Practically perfect in every way
Joined
Mar 24, 2006
Messages
13,057
Reaction score
5
Location
York
just curious, does anyone know where the L numbering system for plecs came from? and why did someone bother numbering plecs and not do it with other fish? Is there some reason the name isn't enough. Just curious why we have it at all?
 
the L number system was created by DATZ magazine (a German publication) and assigned to plecos that had yet to be scientificly studied

other than that I don't know
 
so it could be like a holding number almost?

anyone else?
 
The L stands for Loricariidae, incidentally. There's a C number system, too, for Corydoras. Whether it stands for Corydoras or the family Callichthyidae or the subfamily Corydoradinae, I do not know.

It's perhaps worth mentioning what professional scientists do when they discover new species and before the beast is given a name. They don't use anything like L or C numbers, but instead use things like Corydoras sp. nov., where the "nov" stands for novum, i.e., "new" in Latin. You will also quite commonly see something like Corydoras sp. A, Corydoras sp. B, etc., where there are long lists of new species.

Another common occurence is to use Corydoras sp. aff. palaeatus or Corydoras sp. cf. palaeatus. The "sp. aff" means affinis and implies the specimen has affinity with, but you are sure it is not identical to, Corydoras palaeatus. The "sp. cf." means confer and implies that you are fairly sure it is the same thing as Corydoras palaeatus, but you (or science generally) needs to conduct further study to be 100% sure.

Aquarists get these two muddled up all the time, and will talk about Panaque sp. cf. nigrolienatus such as L027a and L330, for example, as being a different species to Panaque nigrolienatus, L190. Accordingly to their Latin names, the discoverers of those different L numbers are fairly sure they are all the same species and believe that the physical differences between them are down to differences in populations. Anything "sp. aff." on the otherhand really is a new species, albeit it one closely related to something already recognised.

Cheers,

Neale

(PS. Please note that you don't italicise the "sp.", "aff.", or "cf." when writing these names.)
 
I wasn't going to mention this but due to Dr Monks indepth answer including "C" numbers......

Danios are starting to appear as "TW" numbers
the TW refers to Tin-Win of the Hein Aquarium co ltd in Myanmar
 

Most reactions

Back
Top