the_lock_man said:
I would like to propose that the word winning or any connotation of the said word should be banned forever from this topic. Intelligent posts only (sorry if this means some may not be able to join in) with some added meaning vs one liners of just nonsense
I
Proposal denied, like TallTree would have taken a blind bit of notice anyway.
And I'm winning.
Ouch! That's got to hurt, even a little.
Referring, of course, to TLM as I am clearly winning.
Honestly, I think that its a good idea, but it would be impossible to enforce - unless TLM or I locked it at the next inane post. Of course, there's been 244 pages of inane posts. Why change it now?
Eventually, someone will do something in this thread so stupid that it will force us to lock it - and either me or the_lock_man will end up winning.
BTW, did anyone else noticed TLM's username was MADE for moderation? Its like he knew when he signed up.
@ TT - Your "friend" can cite Australian rules all day. This is an international forum - each person needs to use their proper grammar from their native country. Besides, quoting an "anonymous" friend, with no link is very
bush league in a forum. Cite a website that deals with that specific rule. I found one for the US. If it
is a rule, then there should be one somewhere to provide us with a link. I'd be happy to concede the point, were you providing concrete proof.
Besides, Bigfoot, Loch Ness Monster ("Nessy") and I talked it over, and we voted unanimously that your friend is not real without concrete proof of their existence.
Please note the different usage of the "comma - and" rule. First, is a list - no comma before the and. Second is a comma before the and, as it separates the independent clauses. The above phrase could have been written: Besides, Bigfoot, Nessy and I talked it over. We voted unanimously that your friend is not real...
Do you see the difference?
(Who would have ever thought I'd get into a punctuation debate on a fish forum? Certainly not me when I first signed up! All in fun though!)