SimonA
Fishaholic
The sick part is that he filmed it...
........and went to the trouble of making it available on the internet......SimonA said:The sick part is that he filmed it...
I think that whether a fish consciously experiences pain or not is a moot point here, because the fact is that they do feel pain. Anyone who has seen a fish stress out over poor water conditions or an injury can see that they react to damaging stimuli, which could be interpreted as a form of pain, however primitive. I think that, in keeping a pet which requires live food, one takes on the moral obligation of making the death of said food as quick and painless as possible; and obligation which the person whom this thread is about obviously ignored.endparenthesis said:If it makes you feel any better, my research suggests that fish don't consciously experience pain (or anything, really). But so far people don't seem that interested in the science behind these things.
If it makes you feel any better, my research suggests that fish don't consciously experience pain (or anything, really). But so far people don't seem that interested in the science behind these things.
Taping the event proves cruelty?guppymonkey said:Taping the event is the major evidence of cruelty, this person fed the oscar to the piranha so that he could derive pleasure from watching an animal suffer harm.
There is a difference between the Discovery Channel and this guy. I have never seen a show on the Discovery Channel or Animal Planet where they said watch as we feed this live animal to other animals and gain pleasure from watching it. What this guy did is NOT natural in any way! There is no place on earth where fish are air dropped in on hungry animals and forcably restrained until they are killed over a long period of time. In nature the piranha have to go find their food and hunt it down. I am not saying that feeding feeder fish is cruel, but the manner in which this person fed his fish is cruel. Especially taping the event. Do you tape your fish eating their flake food? Probably not. But taping a live animal being eaten is okay because these fish eat fish when they are in their natural habitat? Thats like saying that dog fights are okay because in nature canines will fight eat other occassionally. Gaining pleasure from watching something suffer is wrong whether you are watching a fish being slowly ripped apart or if you are watching a dog or rooster fight.BlueIce said:Taping the event proves cruelty?
Dam..don't watch TLC or Discovery...the things they tape would probably make you want to kill yourself..
Taping it proves nothing more then taping a lion taking down a zebra...it is fascinating.... and natural....
It isn't like he taped people beating a dog for god's sake.