I've been following this thread with interest. DoubleDutch has hit the mark.
First, let me say that hybridization in fish is a very different and much more serious issue than hybrid dog or cat breeds. Dogs and cats are domesticated animals, and no one is going to have much concern over any of these somehow establishing themselves in the natural ecosystem and thus interfering with the gene pool of wild species. But this is a serious threat with fish.
Some of the fish we maintain are endangered in the wild, at serious risk of disappearing completely; some already have. Re-establishing wild populations from aquarium-bred fish would be a significant help to our planet. But this requires pure wild strains. Introducing hybrids could have quite the opposite result. The complex web of life as we know it has order built in through evolution; accidentally or even deliberately affecting this order in one's fish tank is one thing, but then introducing that change into the wild is quite another.
The point about these species never encountering each other in the wild is very true. As is the observation that in the relatively few situations when this does occur, for reasons of nature the fish never seem to cross-breed. This is something that will usually only occur when we put these species into an artificial environment such as the aquarium. Fish in the habitat will continue to evolve as a distinct species, not through hybridization.
As responsible aquarists, we should absolutely never introduce "contaminated" species into the trade. If these hybrids occur in our aquaria, then they should live their lives to the end in those aquaria. It is no good thinking others will somehow protect things; it is better not to provide the opportunity in the first place.
Byron.