matthewlee1959
Mostly New Member
As a small business person and former photographer I understand the purpose of patents, trademarks and copyrights. I also agree with them since the person who does the work should be the one profiting from their ideas and efforts. My point was that now these fish are out in the world where it is almost impossible to enforce the trademarks and patents, much like music sharing and people who get their free 8x10 portrait take it home, scan it and then give it away to all their friends and relatives. Photographers recognized they could no longer enforce their copyright so they just charge a very large upfront fee and allow people to do whatever they want with the digital files and photographs. It's my understanding about the law that it is even illegal to give them away without paying compensation to the patent holder and and trademarking means we can only use the term GloFish to refer to actual AFAIK GloFish. Granted I'm not a lawyer, but just ask any trucker and they'll tell you we are experts on just about any subject. (Kidding!)fluttermoth said:
AFAIK it's only if you sold home bred GloFish that you'd get into any trouble; patents and trademarks are there to protect the inventors investment, so if they just bred in your tank and you either kept them or gave them away, there wouldn't be any legal issues, as you wouldn't be profiting from someone else's research and development.I would like to know what good trademarking and patents are since any hobbyist can breed them?