The December FOTM Contest Poll is open!
🏆 Click to vote! 🏆
Not quite eons, if they are capable of reaching the speed of light (the fastest anything can travle), carbon based matter (aliens and all) expand and they seemingly can jump throgh time, completely stopping all ageing on their bodys. It would be like us sending a man at the speed of light maybe one light-year from earth and then haveing him come back at the same speed of light. To him it would take be 2 years, but to use it would be a hundred or so. So in theory if aliens had this technology, it would still take them a very long time to get here, but they would be able to survive the travle here and back. ^And all of the above is a therory that NASA came up with, im not sure if its acurate or not.^ :shrug: (Theres also teh theory of worms holes, but thats differant)I really believe that alien life forms more intelligent than us would spend eons travelling across the universe
This one really freaked me out when I was younger, apparently taken 'inside Newby Church, N Yorkshire, in the early 1960s, by Revd KF Lord. He saw nothing at the time. ' Now, I know it couldn't have been too brilliantly photedited, becasue the book I saw it in was published way before the technology for this sort of thing existed.
This one really freaked me out when I was younger, apparently taken 'inside Newby Church, N Yorkshire, in the early 1960s, by Revd KF Lord. He saw nothing at the time. ' Now, I know it couldn't have been too brilliantly photedited, becasue the book I saw it in was published way before the technology for this sort of thing existed.
Though my understanding of the theory of relativity is that no one, and no physical object, can reach the speed of light as it would take more energy than is in the universe...
A theory, in the context of science, is a logically self-consistent model or framework for describing the behavior of a certain natural phenomena. A theory typically describes the behavior of much broader sets of phenomena than a hypothesis — commonly, a large number of hypotheses may be logically bound together by a single theory.
...
Scientists never claim absolute knowledge. Unlike a mathematical proof, a proven scientific theory is always open to falsification, if new evidence is presented. Even the most basic and fundamental theories may turn out to be imperfect if new observations are inconsistent with them. Critical to this process is making every relevant aspect of research publicly available, which permits peer review of published results, and also allows ongoing review and repeating of experiments and observations by multiple researchers operating independently of one another. Only by fulfilling these expectations can it be determined how reliable the experimental results are for potential use by others.
It looks like the camera was moved very quickly at the end. but the little sparks are bizzarre.
Who gave it to you?