Future is wild

totalbolshevik

Fish Crazy
Joined
May 31, 2003
Messages
359
Reaction score
0
Location
in front of the computer
Don't worry this does have to do with fish but if anyone has seen that show on Animal Planet called "the Future is Wild" those things called "flish" are ridiculous why on earth would an aquatic animal be forced to evolve wings I don't think it even explained that for people who have not seen it, Flish are fish that have wings and spend most of their time in the air I know about flying fish but these are different they can actually fly instead of just gliding for a bit the very concept is just total bolshevik also the giant walking squid are even worse. :lol:
 
Not to worry! You are not alone. Human eye's are better for giveing us proper info!!! ;)








Graeme.
 
I find htat show incorrect and completly ridicualius (i cant spell :D )
 
I think that show was just for entertaining the viewers. IMO it was actually very good. It had a good goofiness to it that kept me watching - cuz I kept laughing! :lol:
 
Jesse said:
I think that show was just for entertaining the viewers. IMO it was actually very good. It had a good goofiness to it that kept me watching - cuz I kept laughing! :lol:
I agree and I also laughed it was soooooo ridiculous the animals they made up!
 
me too, dont they recognze that there might be a new order of animals after mammals?? Cepalopods?!?!?! If they are supposed to be sucessful, shudnt we be all squids by now??

I do agree with the mammals being extinct thing tho.
 
I also agree with the mammals being extinct, but they really do need to come up with a new class of animal that we've not seen before maybe they're just scared I thought it was sad that mammals were extinct... :-(
 
Actually, they didn't say that mamals were extict, but almost. Remember the cave mice?

BTW, the whole neo-darwinism is bunk. They take it waayy tooo far. Darwin never asserted that man came from ape, and there's no proof to that at all. IF evolution did happen, it was seperate. Homo sapians didn't evolve from Homo erectus (who was in Asia long before man, supposedly), they were two totally different species. And if that's true than why would the Homo genus evolve from monkies? It's all bunk!


I do believe in specialization, I do bbelieve in manipulation, but I can never believe in evolution.
 
cichlid_freak said:
Actually, they didn't say that mamals were extict, but almost. Remember the cave mice?

BTW, the whole neo-darwinism is bunk. They take it waayy tooo far. Darwin never asserted that man came from ape, and there's no proof to that at all. IF evolution did happen, it was seperate. Homo sapians didn't evolve from Homo erectus (who was in Asia long before man, supposedly), they were two totally different species. And if that's true than why would the Homo genus evolve from monkies? It's all bunk!


I do believe in specialization, I do bbelieve in manipulation, but I can never believe in evolution.
i believe in evolution(no offence) and i think we are from apes OR another family of apes thats still evolving. I think that specialization is the same thing as evoltuion, but species who specialize almost always dont succed when the environment changes. And sometimes, i think that mans effort to save a certain species because it is only found that that small island is a waste of time and not to mention, money, that species is gonna be extict anyway,as it will have no chance to adapt, and the already small gene pool) why not spend the money on a more productive processes(like education,force businesses to be more environmentally friendly and such).

edit:eek:h yeah, i changed my mind about the mammals being extinct. Mammals shud still be there, but not the dominant class of animals anymore.(like the mice).
 

Most reactions

Back
Top