yahtzee? is that you lol?I don't have Call of Duty MW2 and I don't want it, I have played it however. I don't really like it or any other game in the COD series, This is becuase I believe a good game should be able to stand up completely on its single player. The COD single player sucks, they're just repetitive campaigns (Find wall - Hide behind wall - Jump up and shoot bad guys - Quickly get behind wall again - Repeat ). Yes the multi-player is good and fun to play but it shouldn't have to be. I think games like Far Cry 2 are best, with an awesome single player, multi-player that isn't bad and the best map editor ever in a game for one of the current generation consoles (Here I mean the 360 and PS3, the pathetic white lump known as the 'Wii' doesn't count)
Assassins creed 1 got old pretty quick but the second is much better.
As for the topic.
I got modern warfare 1. Thought it was good, but I'm not an online sort of person. So is the campaign better or worse on mw2?
MW2 has to be the greatest game I've ever played, but I refuse to play with anyone that runs around with a noobtube or thumper with scavenger pro, It's the noobiest setup and requires no skill, as soon as I see someone do that, I leave, people that use these crapy nooby techniques ruin the game, the only gun you need is the UMP45 with a silencer, and an AA-12 for room raids.
My setup:
UMP45 silenced
Spas-12, AA-12 or the corsair with a tactical knife.
Stun grenades, throwing knife
Marathon
Cold blooded
Commando
Harriers, Chopper Gunner, Nuke
Sniper rifles such as the intervention were invented for 1/4 scoping (quick scoping) There's nothing let getting 4 or 5 mates, and running around shelling seven shades of #105### out of each other.
I hate those guys who go around with Commando and have the ability to teleport 6 feet to knife you oh wait