For spawning purposes yes, but not full time living
Don’t miss out on the best deals of the season! Shop now 🎁
Ok, but do you think I could add around 25cm more of corydoras @mcordelia? @NCaquatics what do you think as well? I know if I am able to get corys then I will go with sterbai without a doubt. @essjay , do you think I could fit that amount of fish in? Currently there is 180 cm when the tank can hold 130cm?One way to tell how your tank is handling the bioload is to measure nitrates before your next water change. If there above 20ppm, then you need to consider whether you will be able to handle a consistent routine of more frequent water changes to keep up with the bioload in the tank.
It's the other way roundif you have soft water and a low pH for example, your tank is potentially more at risk for generating poisonous conditions if ammonia spikes than a hard water high pH tank
I don't stay where the tank is all the time unfortunately, my dad will only want a small tank which won't be able to accomodate most of the fish. Maybe an ancistrus could go there but they get quite big. But, I probably won't get a tank where I am now, as my dad wants me to be able to look after my other ones first and then maybe look at another tank here. He did have one but he removed it unfortunately. And also there isn't much roomI can't really answer your questions until you reflect on the points I made above. What are your nitrates before water changes? Are you able to commit to twice weekly large water changes if necessary?
Stocking depends on the following factors:
1) fish suitability to water
2) fish suitability with each other
3) existing bioload of tank (filtration, plants, water change routine, pH, etc)
4) owner ability to take care of any fish special considerations (typically applies to more complicated fish)
Over the course of this thread, you have progressed through researching items 1 and 2, so now you're at 3 where you have to figure out whether your particular tank can handle more fish. We can't really tell you that, because there are a lot of factors involved. The "inches per gallon" rule is a good rule of thumb to start with, and I would say for novice fishkeepers is probably not worth exceeding. However, there are many aspects that factor into whether water parameters are stable and healthy for the fish, including things like pH (if you have soft water and a low pH for example, your tank is potentially more at risk for generating poisonous conditions if ammonia spikes than a hard water high pH tank). Plants play a big role in stabilizing water parameters as well. Finally, it depends on you and your ability to commit time to your fish. I personally cannot do a water change every week because my schedule doesn't allow for that, so I have to take it into account when stocking my tank. If I understand correctly, you don't spend the full week where the fish tank resides, so that may make any complicated water change schedules infeasible for you. What about setting up another fish tank at the other house? Is that a possibility?
Here I was thinking there was some redeeming factor to my awful water, but guess not! Sorry that I got it backwards, I must have misunderstood back when you and ITViking were talking about his fish-in cycle.It's the other way round
With the plants I got some broad leaved ones and some curly ones. The curly ones are fine but my lemon ancistrus completely obliterated the broad leaved ones. I have been advised to go with anubias and java fern as they are hardier. Is this correct?Should I get some java fern and anubias to help remove ammonia?In a tank with no live plants, nitrate should not go up by more than 20 ppm above tap water level. In a tank with live plants, nitrate will not increase by that much, if at all, even with an overstocked tank as the plants remove ammonia made by the fish and they don't turn it into nitrate.
It's the other way round
Ammonia in water exists in 2 forms - toxic ammonia and non-toxic ammonium. The amount in each form depends on the pH (and temperature but our tanks don't vary by more than the odd degree or two while pH can vary a lot).
The lower the pH, the more is ammonium and at very low pH there is virtually none in the toxic form. But as the pH increases above 7, the more there is in the toxic ammonia form.
Hardness itself doesn't affect the ammonia-ammonium balance, though high pH is more likely in hard water and low pH in soft water. (Though some places have pH over 7 with soft water - I live in one)
So I want to make sure I have this right: soft water with low pH is the "best" in terms of not being toxic immediately when ammonia starts to appear, or is there no bearing on hardness at all? Say if you had hard water with low pH (I know that's much more unusual die to the buffering capacity of most minerals that make up "hardness"), would your fish be equally not quite as screwed as in the soft water low pH scenario?