Are plants enough to replace water changes

lee_an

Fish Fanatic
Joined
Aug 28, 2004
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Location
Singapore
I have water lettuce for almost every tank.(i live in the tropics and put the tanks outside.Are plants good to absorb waste.Why is there so much dirt at the bottom.also.
 
Right. Plus, there's probably dirt on the bottom if you haven't done any water changes or vaccuumed it out - it's probably fish poo.
 
Plants don't absorb waste... they use nitrates which are the byproducts of the nitrogen cycle. The fish poo remains and sinks to the bottom.
 
The only thing that replaces water changes is to have a volume of water large enough it supports the diversity needed to keep the water clean, and that's something about the size of a pond which still does water changes after a fashion with rain and evaporation.
 
Teelie said:
The only thing that replaces water changes is to have a volume of water large enough it supports the diversity needed to keep the water clean, and that's something about the size of a pond which still does water changes after a fashion with rain and evaporation.
That would depend on the size of the pond and the population in it. A large enough pond with plants, good lighting, no pollution and a low enough population of fish would be stable. Its difficult to maintain that balance though.

With a fish tank water changes are necessary. Plants can take care of some of the waste but nitrates will build up and the plants won't use all of them most of the time. High nitrates from fish waste and rotting food or plant matter will stunt the growth of fish and lead to an early death for them. Live plants can only handle so much though sometimes its necessary to dilute the nitrates with fresh water.
 

Most reactions

Back
Top