TechnicolourBetta
New Member
That very well could be.
But the point was that fish was still concidered a double tail despite the split not following the whole fin and despite the lobe being smaller, it was still classified as a DT, thusly this person's fish could easilly be classified as such.
And if you take a look at the second link it simply states that a split, perfect or not, is a double. A split tail, as everyone was talking about, is a type of tail, similar to the double tail, but the top lobe is signifacantly smaller than the lower lobe of the caudal fin, this guy looks like each of his caudal lobes are the same in size.
But the point was that fish was still concidered a double tail despite the split not following the whole fin and despite the lobe being smaller, it was still classified as a DT, thusly this person's fish could easilly be classified as such.
And if you take a look at the second link it simply states that a split, perfect or not, is a double. A split tail, as everyone was talking about, is a type of tail, similar to the double tail, but the top lobe is signifacantly smaller than the lower lobe of the caudal fin, this guy looks like each of his caudal lobes are the same in size.