I do not use RO but I have the same basic thing out of the tap. GH is officially 7 ppm, and KH zero. I never add anything to increase either, though back in the 1990's I did buffer two of my larger tanks with dolomite in the filter, and it kept the pH mid-6's without touching the GH and that was fine for the fish I had then. I now only maintain soft water fish, so they thrive in this. For plants, I do not attempt an aquatic garden but simply want some green plants growing, and I also have floating plants. I use a comprehensive liquid once a week, and comprehensive substrate tabs, and I have found this is just enough calcium for the plants I have. Nothing fancy, the fish come first. I mentioned using Equilibrium in an earlier post, and that was on the advice of whomever, but a marine biologist got me away from that for the sake of the fish.
The pH varies among my tanks, but each tank stabilizes and the pH has remained where it is for over a decade now. When I test prior to the weekly water change and find that every time, for more than 10 years now, the pH in tank "A" has been 6.0 or 6.2, and in tank "B" has been 5.4 or 5.6, and in tank "C" has been below 5...there is no doubt but that the tanks are biologically stable. Given that my fish all come from near-identical waters, this is not a problem at all. To suggest that fish species that have evolved to function best in such water, for some reason must have re-mineralized water in the aquarium, makes no sense.
Many of the so-called "rules" that have become established in this hobby have specific situations, and cannot apply across the board. What I do, and what
@seangee does, obviously would be a death knell to fish species requiring harder water. This is why several of us on this forum are so insistent when it comes to GH as the starting point.