Why is it not advisable to do a water change and then redose ammonia?Oh and by the way, doing water changes during the fishless cycle is not advisable unless you added too much ammonia dosages or if there are problems occurring during the cycle process.
If you do water changes this reduces the ammonia every time and if the BB has not started to be established then this can upset the cycle.
.
Can you read my post again please, you are quite correct and I agree 100%, just to clarify I did mention very biefly why -Why is it not advisable to do a water change and then redose ammonia?
Sometimes a water change is essential when cycling, especially when people are using 4 or 5 ppm ammonia, which produces nitrites and nitrates so high, and depletes KH so much, that the cycle slows down to a trickle or even stalls. There are absolutely no drawbacks whatsoever to changing water during a cycle, and it will speed most cycles up.
Ok. But my point was that a water change during a cycle can only be beneficial, and is often a good thing even when there are no ‘problems’. Cycling at high ammonia and nitrite levels needn’t lead to problems, but a water change is still beneficial.Can you read my post again please, you are quite correct and I agree 100%, just to clarify I did mention very biefly why -
I have mentioned - "doing water changes during the fishless cycle is not advisable unless you added too much ammonia dosages or if there are problems occurring during the cycle process."
And also - "If you do water changes this reduces the ammonia every time if the BB has not started to be established then this can upset the cycle."
Am not being argumentive and I wrote nothing that contradicts anything in regards to the cycling process, I just did not explain in full details, just wrote very briefly why is all. OK?
Because she’s trying to cycle a tank really, really quickly, almost instantly quickly, and isn’t following the proper process. Fast growing plants are much better at absorbing ammonia therefore supporting the cycling (and safety) of any living thing being added to the tank.Why?
All plants will do is remove ammonia, thus limiting the growth of bacteria. A quicker cycle would be to have no plants at all, then the bacteria get all the food. They double their numbers every day. Having plants consume the ammonia isn’t cycling.Because she’s trying to cycle a tank really, really quickly, almost instantly quickly, and isn’t following the proper process. Fast growing plants are much better at absorbing ammonia therefore supporting the cycling (and safety) of any living thing being added to the tank.
Using plants in ‘Silent Cycling’ seems to be a well researched process and successful enough that some people state you can add a shoal of fish almost instantly.All plants will do is remove ammonia, thus limiting the growth of bacteria. A quicker cycle would be to have no plants at all, then the bacteria get all the food. They double their numbers every day. Having plants consume the ammonia isn’t cycling.
True, but the tank isn’t cycled. It’s using plants instead of bacteria. Cycling a filter means growing a colony of bacteria.Using plants in ‘Silent Cycling’ seems to be a well researched process and successful enough that some people state you can add a shoal of fish almost instantly.
There is a well documented “Silent Cycle” process that uses fast growing plants. Google.True, but the tank isn’t cycled. It’s using plants instead of bacteria. Cycling a filter means growing a colony of bacteria.
You’ve already said that in your previous post.There is a well documented “Silent Cycle” process that uses fast growing plants. Google.
I did, and if you Google, or read the ‘stickies‘ on here you will find out how it works.You’ve already said that in your previous post.
Do you mean OWF tank picture in post #11?what kind of plants are those? Nice. They look like the terrestrial kind that shouldn’t be submerged.
There anibius plants.what kind of plants are those? Nice. They look like the terrestrial kind that shouldn’t be submerged.