Dorkhedeos
Boss Major
damn, imagine spending like 20 bucks to get a cardinal killed they will probably just stick it in some clove oil
I cant believe that someone would kill their fish with boiling water,that is the worst method thats been mentioned, its brutal and cruel.
1. ACCEPTABLE METHODS OF EUTHANASIA
-Anasesthetic overdose. This may require a visit to the vet in countries where the necessary chemicals are available only on prescription. Phone the vet first-he may be willing to supply the chemical for home use (minimises stress for the fish by avoiding a journey to the vet), but may insist on performing the task himself. In this case, the aquarist must decide whether to take the fish to the vet or arrange a home visit. This method of euthanasia is suitable for any size of fish, and is particularly suitable where numbers are involved, e.g. where a brood is to be culled (see also below). For suitable anaesthetics and dosages, see Chapter 27.
-Concussion, with destruction of the brain. The fish should be netted and wrapped in a cloth (for grip) with its head exposed. The head is then hit forcefully against a hard object (doorstep, edge of table, large rock). Alternatively, a hard object (rock, hammer) can be brought down on the head of the fish. Fishing (angling) shops stock a type of club, known as a 'priest', used for despatching salmon, trout, etc, which is ideal for killing larger fish. Unless the head has been completely cu\rushed during the operation, then the brain should subsequently be pierced, via the top of the head, with a sharp instrument (e.g. a knife or scissors), to ensure the fish is dead and not just stunned.
-Decapitation, with destruction of the brain. If the fish is small and elongate, its head can be severed using a sharp knife or scissors. This method of euthanasia is unsuitable for larger or deep-bodied fish as the operation may take some time and cause acute suffering. The fish should b held in a cloth, as for concussion, and, because the brain may remain conscious for a while after decapitation, the brain should be pierced and destroyed, as for concussion, above.
-Predation. It is sometimes necessary to dispose of genetically deformed or stunted fry, or surplus number, by culling. (It is normally impracticable for the amateur to rear and find homes for the hundreds of thousands of fry produced by some fish.) it is generally regarded as humane to feed such fry to a piscivore (this is the normal and natural fate of most fry in the wild) with the following provisos:
- The fry muste be healthey (apart from any genetic problems).
- The size of the predator(s) must be such that each fish is eaten quickly.
- The numbers of fry fed at any one time should be such that they are all eaten quickly, and none left to share the predator's tank, in terror, until it is hungry again.
Note: in some countries it may be illegal to feed any live fish to another fish or other animals.
2. UNACCEPTABLE METHODS OF EUTHANASIA
The following methods of euthanasia cause suffering, and are totally unacceptable:
-Flushing a live fish down the lavatory or sink waste disposal unit (see also Disposal of dead fish, Chapter 26)
-Breaking the neck without subsequent destruction of the brain; the fish may remain alive for some time, and still be conscious when its 'corpse' is disposed of.
-Suffocation, by removal of water.
-Dropping a live fish into boiling or iced water.
-Slow chilling (with or without water). (This method is often suggested in aquarium literature, on the basis that the metabolism slows and the fish slips away.) However, it is now thought that the physiological processes involved are painful and the suffering considerable.)
Diseased fish, alive or dead, should never be fed to other fish, as this may transmit infection. Corpses should be disposed of safely and responsibly as discussed in Chapter 26.
I would like to point out that it is impossible to scientifically prove a negative beyond any shadow of doubt. It is literally impossible to prove that anything doesn't feel pain without asking it, and while there is a lack of scientific knowledge, that study is the best information we have on the subject to date. Gentle souls may choose to err on the side of caution, which is absolutely a good idea at times, but if I were a betting (wo)man, I'd put my money on crustaceans not feeling pain.Norwegian study said:The Norwegian study, even while saying it’s unlikely that crustaceans feel pain, also cautioned that more research is needed because there is a scarcity of scientific knowledge on the subject.
....be careful about quoting studies until you read what they based their results on. SH