Hey kaiv, what do you think happens when a "polishing pad" needs to be replaced. I've found myself thinking about that. I mean, in some ways it seems like the fine silt sort of stuff it will have picked up would seem to just keep making it a better and better filter for smaller debris. Obviously in some situations the floss pad could get totally clogged and need some squeezing out and then there are the times when a floss pad eventually can't handle any more squeeze-outs and wants to break apart, obviously crying out for replacement.
But what I was thinking about was whether during its reasonable (usually short) lifetime of use it maybe actually gets better at its job as it gets more fine debris trapped in it? What do you think?
~~waterdrop~~
Interesting point, I have keep the same pad in since the before Christmas only cleaning it once every 3 weeks if that, and haven't seen things get any worse really, but I do wonder if it reduces the overall flow of the filtration..When I first got the filter it did a wonderful job but it did have active carbon bags in there then too so hard to tell whether it was more to do with carbon or the new floss pad or indeed as it was new.
All the other filters in the canister are quite porous in comparison so don't hold back water flow as much, even when fairly "grubby" after months of usage without cleaning. In contrast the floss pads are quite restrictive to flow. When they eventually get "caked" in gunk it lowers flow rate quite substantially. If completely blocked then I am sure the water can get around the pads edges and they'll then serve no purpose other than to lower flow
![Frown :( :(]()
.
I haven't got new floss pads fitted as yet (I have a couple in stock though) as I am waiting for the new tank to be setup (this weekend hopefully) and wanted to use the old pads to clear the murky water from a new sand substrate tank before replacing them. I'll not have any clear observations to feedback on for some time now either, as you know this hobby takes a good deal of time to find things out, and with a new tank I'll be waiting even longer to understand the full floss filtering pros/cons as I'll be starting with new substrate, a much bigger volume tank and 2 filters.
I personally guess that replacing the floss once in a while (every 2 months at most, but cleaning it in tank water every 2-4 weeks) is the best route to take. With a canister filters multiple layers there is already fairly good mechanical water filtration but I am sure bits would get through if the floss is completely blocked, as the water would flow around the edges...However just replacing and not re-using the floss when it is "dirty" is a complete waste of money in my opinion - at least rinse and re-use a couple of times I'd say. A older dirty but not clogged floss filter should do the small particle filtering at least as good as a new one.
For me though I prefer higher flow rates over more efficient floss filtering which is why I haven't put 2 pads in for example - maybe I'll have the best of both worlds with 2 x ex1200's in a 5ft tank
the carbon does do harm if its just left in the filter when it has expired it will release the toxins back into the water that it once soaked up
Good point, I guess it depends on why the carbon is in there though.
If it was used to remove any toxins deliberately then yes there would be a risk to keep it in, but the chances are that it was put into the filter when starting out so will only release the same as went in which is all handleable by the bacteria in the rest of the media.
I have a couple of spare bags which I keep back until I might need them after any nasty medication requirements...so far no issues like that *touches wood*