I was referencing the Walstad method in regards to ammonium uptake. But, when we talk about 'ammonia' in the hobby, most are referencing what is measured by most test kits, which is the sum of the ammonia and ammonium.
Walsted's article regarding plants affinity for ammonium versus nitrate...
http/www.theaquariumwiki.com/Plants_and_Biological_Filtration
Ammonia versus ammonium...
http/www.extension.iastate.edu/CropNews/2008/0421JohnSawyer.htm
As the ammonium gets used up, the ammonia that remains can be converted to ammonium (as dictated by the article referenced above), as determined by the pH of the water. And thereby, the plants are 'removing' the ammonia from the water.
Daize is correct though, and carbon is the limiting factor for plant growth. But, assuming a sufficient supply of carbon is present, many plants can use the ammonium present in the water for growth and don't require nitrate. Nitrates are used primarily in fertilizers because it is far less toxic than ammonia in a tank, and if the pH is high enough, adding ammonium to the water to fertilize the plants would create toxic ammonia in the water.
Walsted's article regarding plants affinity for ammonium versus nitrate...
http/www.theaquariumwiki.com/Plants_and_Biological_Filtration
Ammonia versus ammonium...
http/www.extension.iastate.edu/CropNews/2008/0421JohnSawyer.htm
As the ammonium gets used up, the ammonia that remains can be converted to ammonium (as dictated by the article referenced above), as determined by the pH of the water. And thereby, the plants are 'removing' the ammonia from the water.
Daize is correct though, and carbon is the limiting factor for plant growth. But, assuming a sufficient supply of carbon is present, many plants can use the ammonium present in the water for growth and don't require nitrate. Nitrates are used primarily in fertilizers because it is far less toxic than ammonia in a tank, and if the pH is high enough, adding ammonium to the water to fertilize the plants would create toxic ammonia in the water.