waterdrop
Enthusiastic "Re-Beginner"
Yes the thing about various species eating up their babies always seemed crazy to me when I was younger. I think it finally "clicked" for me years later while reading some paper by a harvard biologist and I realized its sort of a dual thing of both increasing the chance of survival of the population "as a whole" and yet of allowing the mutations in the "collective genome" to show their potential improvements to survivability. (make sense?) Let's see, to say it differently, lets say the species never intends (intends is an incorrect term here, but hey, who cares?) to multiply at the rate that it would if all babies survived, but as we all know, there will be a small number of mutations to the genes of a few of the babies and those mutations might help those babies to be somehow better at surviving their initial exposure to the world. So the parents "eat back" some of the "protein" they've given up by having the large birth set (in the wild of course every tiny bit of high energy food like protein you can get is essential to survival) and maybe some of the babies, including maybe some of the babies with "the best new mutations for survival" will escape the parents and go on to further the next generation of the population and perhaps make it a stronger, tougher species with a still better survival rate.
Anyway, don't know why I got off on that, but species that eat their young make for a fascinating topic that usually gets people's attention!
~~waterdrop~~
Anyway, don't know why I got off on that, but species that eat their young make for a fascinating topic that usually gets people's attention!
~~waterdrop~~