... and remember the board rules here about other forums.....
A very detailed site about a small group of fish will be far better then yet another attempt to be all things to everyone. There are thousands of sites around with the same brief info about dozens of common fish, much fewer good resources for people looking for depth and unusual species.
It should also be kept up to date. New species are coming along all the time, reclassification happens almost weekly in some groups. If people search for xidocious halitosis and your site is still calling it abrcadabra whodathortit they won't find your site, even though your material might otherwise be useful.
This thread is pretty off topic, and discussion of web authoring techniques is making it even more so, let's loose that.
I've not deleted it because discussing "what we want from a fish website" may be useful.
A very detailed site about a small group of fish will be far better then yet another attempt to be all things to everyone. There are thousands of sites around with the same brief info about dozens of common fish, much fewer good resources for people looking for depth and unusual species.
It should also be kept up to date. New species are coming along all the time, reclassification happens almost weekly in some groups. If people search for xidocious halitosis and your site is still calling it abrcadabra whodathortit they won't find your site, even though your material might otherwise be useful.
This thread is pretty off topic, and discussion of web authoring techniques is making it even more so, let's loose that.
I've not deleted it because discussing "what we want from a fish website" may be useful.