Wolf, I also agree that it's time to consider splitting this forum into sub forums. There are just too many diverse species in this section, but this is ultimately for administration to decide.
Now to your list, I'm glad that you are making an effort to get a basic size list for the commonly kept loaches. May I make a small suggestion? Would it be more helpful to put the size in the form of a range rather than one set number? This may alleviate some of the confusion and debate regarding certain species that have been addressed as not quite conforming to the size that you have recorded in your list. Or, you could state that the numbers in your list reflect an average size and that specimens can exist that are above and below the standard size.
This is just a small suggestion, otherwise, this is a great list and I'm glad you've taken the initiative to do the research and present it in a format that is user-friendly.
Now to your list, I'm glad that you are making an effort to get a basic size list for the commonly kept loaches. May I make a small suggestion? Would it be more helpful to put the size in the form of a range rather than one set number? This may alleviate some of the confusion and debate regarding certain species that have been addressed as not quite conforming to the size that you have recorded in your list. Or, you could state that the numbers in your list reflect an average size and that specimens can exist that are above and below the standard size.
This is just a small suggestion, otherwise, this is a great list and I'm glad you've taken the initiative to do the research and present it in a format that is user-friendly.
