January 2011 Fish Of The Month Voting Poll

-------------------------------------------

  • Mattlee’s Aequidens Diadema

    Votes: 5 7.0%
  • Walkers101’s chocolate cichlid

    Votes: 2 2.8%
  • Star4’s Geophagus Albios

    Votes: 3 4.2%
  • Snowflake311’s WC Hoplarchus Psittacus

    Votes: 9 12.7%
  • Gordonuk’s Platy fry

    Votes: 4 5.6%
  • James Fish’s male Apistogramma

    Votes: 14 19.7%
  • Scotty’s zebra otto

    Votes: 3 4.2%
  • Pest Control’s Male Kribensis

    Votes: 4 5.6%
  • Alasse’s Angel

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • Deanoce’s angelfish,

    Votes: 3 4.2%
  • Carlovel1’s L260 Queen Arabesque Pleco

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • Markandhisfishe’s Lutino Oscar

    Votes: 7 9.9%
  • Darr3ll’s ram

    Votes: 2 2.8%
  • AstonN24vantage’s Angelfish

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Paradise<3

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Elisew's Neolamprologus multifasciatus:

    Votes: 13 18.3%

  • Total voters
    71
Status
Not open for further replies.
they have all been removed by admin by the looks of it . so could i just please state for the record that my photo was tested and proved to be non edited . and hopefully nobody will try and enter a debate and this comment will be left up?
 
What I would like to see is some of this talent put to use in a topic in the Photography section. If the removed debate has a good outcome such as that it is a benefit to all.
 
i have just ordered my own dslr and i will no doubt be posting lots of photos , both fishy and non fishy . id like to claim talent for my oscar shot tolak but to be honest it was a complete fluke lol
 
Any decent picture I end up with is a fluke! :lol: I was talking about a topic for determining the validity of a picture, what techniques and software are used, what to look for, and so on. Your picture passed these things, what are they?

To me this is a sub section of photography talent, much as there are may sub specialties in aquatics.
 
Any decent picture I end up with is a fluke! :lol: I was talking about a topic for determining the validity of a picture, what techniques and software are used, what to look for, and so on. Your picture passed these things, what are they?

To me this is a sub section of photography talent, much as there are may sub specialties in aquatics.

Well i'm off out down tut pub. But I'll gladly but forward a few things to look out for tomorrow, if shown where to post it and whatnot. I'm not an expert at proving images, i'm just a graphic designer who knows a few things to look out for.
 
i dont know what the tests are tolak , in fact im totally useless with photo editing software and can just about manage to resize pics. i emailed the original to freedomfighter who did the tests so i cant comment as to what is involved .
 
I loved Alasse's Angel picture. It shows a bit of the character of the angels with that post of the caring parents with their fry. Maybe I am just an old romantic but I found it truly inspiring.
 
Voted - Can't go past that Apistogramma man.. just too beautiful! :good:

Wish they came around my LFS's more often..
 
Some really nice fish and excellent pictures my compliments to all :good:

But there can only been one voted!
 
Wish I could have voted for 2 or 3 of them. Nice pics.
 
Matt's entry and Star's Geo were my favourites. Only got one vote though :(

James.
 
I apologise if I'm being completely gormless and have missed out on some detail somewhere or other, but an error message keeps appearing every time I try to vote :/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Most reactions

Back
Top