Go for it. I have just shut mine down after having three reefs in last 5 or so years
They are easier than erhaps peole make out but the margins for error are smaller.
You really should get the biggest tank you can get as I started out with a 110 litre one that proved difficult due to the smll volume of water. You really do have to keep your water parameters stable. My last tank 350 litres was the best and had a sump which made the world of difference.
I kept clams and nems and would highly recomennd them.
I found that I only struggled when I overstocked with fish and you need to keep in mind the less is ideal principle for stocking.
Essential items in my opinion are refractometer, test kits, phosphate reactor, skimmer and if keeping clams and nems LED lights
RainboWBacoN420 said:
maybe, just maybe a couple of tridacnid clams if my parameters are on point and 100% stable.
You'll need decent LED or halide lighting, clams literally whither away if light is insufficient
My Maxima clam
HarpyFishLover said:
More research indicates:
I have to get 4 clownfish. I'll fit my tank to meet their needs just to get them. Lol...
DEFINITELY a firefish (apparently it is the worst idea a human can have to put two firefish together)
5 royal grammas (correct me if wrong, but they school?)
Not a humu picasso triggerfish, as apparently they get to be a foot long
A striped damselfish
Small butterflyfish (possibly many of these)
I'd rethink the damself fish they can be very nasty. How bout bangaii cardinals my little favourites and they breed and mouthbreed their young
I wouldnt keep 5 royal grammas, they fight and you rarely see them they hide in the rock. I always had one and they looked ace when you saw them but many more better fish. Blennys are the best characters and yellow watchmen gobies with a pistol shrimp