I understand "hunting" or Culling pest animals to protect live stock though going out hunting for enjoyment to shoot deer... I don't find that responsible. The "enjoyment" part at killing something for "fun" is what I don't like.
Though if you read my post I did say ignore the comment if you don't do it for fun, i.e you do it for an actual reason, preventing pests etc.
Sorry for offence caused but I thought I had covered that at the end of my previous post.
P.S Sarah Palin... is an example I don't appreciate, she goes hunting because she enjoys it and however completely sucks at it evidently and is holding the animals life in her irresponsible and useless hands. If she shot carribou for a reason like described before rather than because she enjoys it and wants to have a photo taken holding its head like a trophy then I would think differently on her type. The type that pay for hunting trips in Africa etc... not farmers protecting live stock.
There's a big difference from hunting to eat or protect and hunting solely for enjoyment.
Though I have my views on killing starving wild animals also, in my eyes its making wildlife much more artificial and controlled. I mean how many years did our flora and fauna flourish before we as human started intervening. By removing an animal which would naturally die what harm is happening to the ecosystem, the natural nitrogen cycle etc etc. (Don't answer, stick to our views)
Anyway... Get a mouse trap, poison = dead mouse in your wall and a trap means more often than not a dead mouse instantly.
that is exactly my point, controlling numbers is necessary, but I believe that we have the responsibility to go about it in the most humane way as possible for the sake of the animals.
