Chasing Puck said:
refusing to research something?
What the heck are you on about not researching something?
I researched MY point, see my last post.
Your article (I read the relevant parts) states that although the chemicals in table salt ARE toxic (yes it says that) the levels are too low to distress any fish.
Well 0.1 Ammonia is too low to distress fish but would you want it in your tank?
Even your article agrees that these things are toxic to fish, your only argument is that there should never be enough of the toxic chemicals to actually harm the fish.
Let me put it this way. If you had two glasses of water, and one contained a very faint trace of poison, too low to harm you but you know it is there. Which would you choose to drink?
Its really a simple matter, table salt isnt deadly, no, but aquarium salt is better.
Edit: From your article :
the quantity is tiny, food-safe, and the fish would be pickled in brine long before potentially toxicity could be reached
That is the basis of your argument. See my analogy on poisoned water. Tell me honestly that you would drink the water with poison instead of the fresh water,.