Correct.No. The smaller the siphon, the easier it is to be careful and the more control you have. It's different.
Correct.No. The smaller the siphon, the easier it is to be careful and the more control you have. It's different.
No. The smaller the siphon, the easier it is to be careful and the more control you have. It's different.
What fun is that?You don't even need to suck on it to start the siphon. Take the tubing to the sink, hold both open ends higher than the rest of the tubing and run water into one end. It needs to be a thin trickle so air pockets aren't trapped as it's not easy to get them out unless you take the whole thing outdoors and swing it round your head. Once the tubing is full of water carry it to the tank, then put a thumb over each end, put one end in the tank the other in the bucket and remove the thumbs.
I call them "adventurers"^^ This ^^
Any time I sand vac w/out a nylon on the Python, I siphon into a bucket...makes it easy to retrieve any....um...suckees?
What fun is that?
You aren't a true fishkeeper without a taste of mulm water every once in a while....
I could try that... Thanks!I'll go with the regular siphon method with the usual narrow airline, if I have bottom oriented fry. One hand holds the siphon at the bottom, and waving fingers scare off fry. It's slow, but you're raising fry, not doing this daily.
I haven't used my mouth on airline in decades. I use @Essjay 's method. It's faster and safer. I would never use ordinary airline on a regular tank, where vaccuuming is a rare chore, but all breeding tanks produce waste. You can still lose fry with any siphon, but attention and control of the hose help.
???Instead of wire hangars to use on the air tubes vould I use paper clips?? Dont know if I can or not...
I could try that... Thanks!
That "someone" was @Slaphppy7 lolSomeone mentioned about using wire hangars to keep the airline straight while vacuuming... I dont have any wire hangars so I wanted to know if paperclips could be used