F FishyTank Fish Fanatic Joined Jan 18, 2007 Messages 67 Reaction score 0 Mar 16, 2007 #1 hey all i need to no which is better i need to no if i should just get live rock and no sand is this a good idea?
hey all i need to no which is better i need to no if i should just get live rock and no sand is this a good idea?
Lynden a "fish hater" Joined Sep 19, 2005 Messages 3,557 Reaction score 0 Location Northern BC, Canada Mar 16, 2007 #2 I never advocate bare bottom tanks. Opinions will differ.
Mr Miagi Veins are flowing with SW, now going back to FW! Joined Mar 5, 2004 Messages 3,865 Reaction score 0 Location Adelaide, Australia! Mar 17, 2007 #3 Lynden said: I never advocate bare bottom tanks. Opinions will differ. Click to expand... I can understand the need for bare bottom in an SPS tank, with there higher flow, but even then you can add it too a sump. Id stick with substrate in a run-of the mill reef display.
Lynden said: I never advocate bare bottom tanks. Opinions will differ. Click to expand... I can understand the need for bare bottom in an SPS tank, with there higher flow, but even then you can add it too a sump. Id stick with substrate in a run-of the mill reef display.
steelhealr Hug a mod Nano Reef Moderator Retired Moderator ⚒️ Joined Dec 27, 2004 Messages 5,632 Reaction score 4 Location Long Island, NY Mar 17, 2007 #4 Agree with Mr. Miaggi on this one. SH
A AliRichardson Fish Fanatic Joined Mar 2, 2007 Messages 72 Reaction score 0 Location Surrey, UK Mar 17, 2007 #5 an inch or so of sand will most likely do you well
SkiFletch Professor Beaker Retired Moderator ⚒️ Joined Sep 22, 2005 Messages 14,074 Reaction score 0 Location Buffalo, NY Mar 18, 2007 #6 Agreed, and an inch or so of aragonite sand, dont waste money on "live sand"