If a fish has a characteristic that could cause defects later in life...should that fish be bred whenever. or should you wait until you find out if such faults could arise and cause the fish problems(ie blindness)?
Could such genetic make-up be passed on to offspring, who could also come up with the same defects later in life?
I know when I bred Doberman's, I had to make sure I had genetic testing (hips, elbows, eyes, heart, blood) done for all the genetic problems that are known to arise..before I bred (AKC requires you wait until 18 months..but it is generally recognized that you wait until after 2 years..so you can test hips/elbows and have as close to accurate test results as possible). And I had to give out a copy of the parents health certificate with each puppy, or if I had not had the testing done..I had to give a refund guarentee for a certain time frame(I just had the tests done..lots easier in the long run).
Do people do this with fish? Should they do this with fish?
I've been wondering this for a while now...since so many people seem to jump right into breeding bettas(not saying anyone is or is not doing that, or that anyone should not breed betta's)...I just saw an opportunity to ask a question I've been pondering (since I had guidelines to go by when breeding dogs..cats are the same way btw).
No offense meant to anyone or towards anyone. Just my curiosity getting the better of me
.