Many water conditioners are commercially available, but some are formulated only to dechlorinate water and/or bind heavy metals. Water additives that form a protective “slime layer” will contain a polymer (often PVP or carboxymethyl cellulose [CMC]) or colloid (Table 4.1). Some additives contain aloe extract from leaves of the Aloe vera plant. Manufacturers of these products claim that the Aloe vera extract promotes healing of damaged tissue. One potential drawback to water additives that contain Aloe vera extract or CMC is the addition of organic waste load that can reduce the water quality and oxygen levels in a closed system. This may not be an issue, depending on the density of fish, length of time fish are held, and oxygen content of the water. However, the effects of these substances on gill tissue are unclear. Other common ingredients of water conditioners include dechlorinating agents such as sodium thiosulfate and 35 asorbic acid, chelating (metal binding) agents such as ethylenedianinetetra acetic acid (EDTA), and buffering agents such as tris (hydroxymethyl) aminomethane that restore acid–base balance.
It is unadvisable to use water additives that contain Aloe vera extract or CMC in closed holding systems due to the potential for these additional organic wastes to reduce water quality and oxygen levels. However, these organic materials likely do not have a negative effect on water quality or oxygen levels in open, flow-through holding or transport systems. Because no studies have directly compared multiple water conditioners, additional research is needed to determine which additive best protects the mucus layer of fish under different conditions.